Show I Letters To The Price For Prejudice Dear I would like to add to the comments made in earlier letters to the editor discussing the question of whether or not to print discriminatory ads in the Most of the comments were made in reference to ads for people to share living 1 do not deny that such a desire is practical and these ads do WERE THE ADS for instead of 1 think many more people perhaps even the Senate would raise an I contend that what you discriminate against is not of only the act of discrimination itself can be Discrimination I a right of every No one should be forced to enjoy association with an an person of another or even a should one be forced not to enjoy such an enforced lack of discrimination is in itself a form of BUT IN THE CASE of a noncompetitive publication paid for by involuntary one must come to a decision on whether to accept discriminatory ads or whether to discriminate against such For a given incident of discrimination there will be those in support of and those who reject the I feel it is far worse to make someone pay for discrimination he is opposed to than to make someone pay for a publication which he knows will degrade no be it minority or The makers of the tion felt this way our government cannot support or deny any group's right to fend for save a group bent on destroying the I WOULD that the Chronicle print no more ads that openly discriminate against any minority or majority of persons until such time as there is open editorial competition on campus another daily or until such time as the Chronicle is paid for out of voluntary assessments I strongly object to Davin for the weaknesses of JOHN DANNENBERG Idealism Beyond Dear Ellis' letter of 6 to imply that the new adopted by the Chronicle u iZ ing to force him to live smoking atheists wish he would read the ruling Ig THE DECISION states that the will not accept ads limiting etc reasons of There k nothing at all to prevent Mr Ellis from writing in his ad chat he doesn't wish smokers or drinkers for As far as that 1 agree with hirn 1 myself do not or argue religion for a pastime but 1 am still discriminated against as far as apartment ing goes because I am not WHEN IT IS simply a person s religion and not his social conduct upon which this segregation is that is pure and simple If Ellis still wishes to make his discrimination there are two city papers which will accept his But we as college students are supposed to be the leaders of tomorrow DISCRIMINATION is evident today in many parts of the country and 1 don't think that even Ellis believes that we can build a better world without the alleviation of let's quote Neff this idealism beyond SUSAN CRONIN See editorial for of the Chronicle policy classified |