Show Il L A COST OF lOW LOV Electricity Rates Lower Lowe r Than Any Other Big U S City Is Claim LOS ANGELES Jan Los 4 4 Los Angeles Angele municipal electric lighting ratte ore are r the lowest of at o aw ny large city In the th States The Tir Crage a Angeleno pays 1 40 monthly tor for the Ite electric tight light In hIs 1 I orne ome om or r supply power 10 er for tor the wale family Iron ron II In Dos Dos- Doston Doston ton Eos-ton ton the bill le Is I 2 63 In Nw Nea e eOr Orleans Or- Or Orleans Or Orleans leans the th a bill Is U 1261 2 61 while In Pro Providence the monthly amount Is le 2 12 38 11 Statistics compiled complIed by E F chief I ens-I- nfl veer neer for tor the th municipal power bureau bu- bu bureau ru bu-ru reau contain surprising figures on the lighting ll bill In 24 H rep rep- rep I ot of o the nation w Ith Itha Itha a population of at or more nore SEATTLE hET T Seattle Wash Where n her hor th the tle muni municipality own owns the th lighting lIs ll system S stem and creat creates Its It current by water waterpower waterpower waterpower power ranks n to Los Angeles with an nn eago a of at 1 I 60 iO and flee Moines Iowa le Is I third on the list 1st with a rate of ot 1 11 68 Kansis Kon City with mth another municipally 0 owned o ned int II pant nt leport a rat rate rati i of S1 1115 l 65 and andI clUe cities farther wont wait Nt have hav greater glOater gi t I rates rate In the th average home horn the th use uso of at elect electo Icily amounts amount to 36 t att hours houra every Ory month Scatter Scatter- good said eald ald In n explaining the th fig uros and at least leut 70 per cent of at the customers are aro ar cen con con- con For For the th verre lighting con con- con sumS sums- the th annual bill In n Los Lo Ang- Ang lea Ane le Is I less les than 17 In Boston It Is over oar 11 31 and In n an San Pran co deco cisco under new tw lower rates Sl 1 60 GO Los Lo Ang Angeles s consumer rs ver werl bythe raved I ed In 1922 1 22 b by the low rates s In effect here hore hr ae a Com corn corn- com P pared l with lIh 1 lui San n Francisco c TABU or 01 RATES HATES RATES The Tho Th table tabi ot of rates In CIties cane based on an average of at 21 2 kilowatt consumption tor for each con con- con sumer consumer Boston Roton Mass Mai 2 12 New Orleans ans La 2 61 Pro nc nce R I 2 gg 38 at ort 2 i ati Norfolk lk Va Vs 2 25 San Mn Antonio Tex Ter 2 26 23 Memphis Tenn 2 26 Atlanta Oa Ga G 2 03 Minneapolis Minn 2 03 Salt Silt Lake Lak City Utah 2 03 Baltimore Md 2 00 New ew Haven Conn 2 00 Buffalo NY N Y v I e Denver Cob Cola Colo 1 i 92 Philadelphia P Pa i Milwaukee MII WI WIs ChIcago III 1 in 85 San Francisco i in New York Portland Ore y 1 76 Detroit Mich i 1 s 1 s h AnIlU City 0 i 1 86 ic Des M Moines 1 1 as Seattle Wash sh Los Angeles elea J m 1 41 nn |