Show u I GRAIN LOSS CA CASE ES I UNDER UNDER ADVISEMENT At the concu conclusion lon of ot the arguments arguments ments by the attorneys on both sides today In the case of or the Globe j GraIn Milling company suing the Inland i Grain company J J I- I ITay ray Taylor Tay- Tay Taylor lor and ond C J Doon for tor on ona ona a 1 promissory sory note Judge George S Bailer her took look the case under men I Thel Thal The plaintiff company alleges allege that the tho Inland Grain company I controlled and owned by Tailor Ta lor lorland land and Doon bought 29 bushels o of grain grain In storage at St gt Louis when grain was aas as selling at per bushel bu- bu bushel bu bushel shel and gave In payment for the loss los sustained by the plaintiff between be- be be between tween what the grain wee wa bought at and anda ahat a hat It finally soh so for It a promissory note tor for has not been beon paid I I The Tho det defendants allege thit there as aas no con consideration tor jor or the note an thero there nc er ne er wn was a a sale sole of 0 the grain or delivery ery 0 of the grain In question to them |