Show STORES STOKES USES TR C S ClAI 1 Affidavit Accusing Hus- Hus Husband Husband Huband band Introduced By Wife S 'S Lawyer NC NEW YORK YonH Oct 19 MII 19 Mr Hattie Johnson procurer procure ot of witnesses for tor Vf W W K II D Stokes wealthy hotel 0 owner ner whose suit I for tor dl from his wife Mr Mrs I Helen Heln Stokes Stoles Is being re- re before Supreme Court Jus Jus- Jus Justice lice Uce Mahoney Mahone today was nae ejected from the court room on application I lion tion of Samuel er chief defenso counsel after detente defense e court court- sc set sel were ero Informed Sirs lira J Johnson ohn on was aas as co witnesses by nodding 1 to then CHARGES MADr MADIl NEW EW ORK 0 Oct Ot 19 An 19 An lim- lim I lt It charging W W C D Tl Stokes Stoke Stol es ith trickery ery in deuce against his wife Mrs Helen rl od stokes toda ans ns Intro Intro- I d io ic d id by Isabore of ot counsel coun- coun sel el l for tor Stokes Stol s Into the tho record ot of the tha retrial Court Ju Justice Mahoney of ot Stokes suit for COI divorce dl dl orco orce from his wife The affidavit was mado made by Mr SIr 1 h rl VII Williams IIams of o Bethel Conn ConnIn In I of ot another lt I math mati b bi her and read Into tho rec 1 ree- ree record ord by Riat 10 1 chief counsel for tor Mr bin Stokes charging that Ir had seen spen Mrs Irs Stokes to In company with Edgar T respondent Wallace respondent co-respondent at nt the summer home hom homo ot of o W U L I near Mrs Irs n home at Bethel Both affidavits It I ll said were the basis baals of ot the trial at nt ot of 1111 Mrs Williamson Williams on on charges of per per- per J 1 II brought by Stokes She aas os acquitted by a 0 jury II torn o The Tho first affidavit lt Introduced In Into In- In Into into to the tho record today by Mr San OD mado made July 17 1922 It declared de- de declared de declared that Mrs Williams had seen seena Beena a woman oman answering the description ot of Mra Mr- Mr Stokes In company with W at the tho home It described as the con conduit con con- dut duit of ot Wallace 1 Mrs Stoles Stokes who hat 1 I been Introduced as Mrs Helen O nn ani and a B Miss Da v Hay The Tho second affidavit It read by Mr said Mrs Williams met Mr Ir Stokes July 16 1922 She Sho was l ting In Danbury Conn when a 11 Miss Edmonds came to visit her there thre e dio dl di ov 0 e a her to New York In B a motor car and took her to Mr office ottlee There Mrs Williams said Bald she with Ith Mr Stokes Stok's while l a pher took down her re- re remarks re remarks marks mb Pressed for or time to get a home she alto said she sIgned what nag waa as alleged to be a II tran tran- tran of t hei het remarks on Mr SIlus assurance that sit alt Bir would I lints o e a II chance chanco to correct any POS poe sic h Inaccuracies I charge she she he said sald In h her hr r re- re repudIating repudiating I affidavit It that Mr Stokes es tricked mo me Into signing It I the first lt It All AliI 1 said wa WM was that the photograph of ot Mrs Mn Stokes I shown me resembled the tho woman I 1 I II ISit Sit saw at Bethel I did not identify I I Mr Vall Wallace ace because I did not row know him Williams WI characterized oth- oth other other I er statements l in the first 11 as absolutely falM also She Sho asserted that allegedly corrected copies I o nor Iter remarks to Mr Stokes hall had hallI I sent Bent to her for her signature but that she sha had considered them i IlIa cur te and had refused to sign th them m m I Mrs Jano Carter negro cook a at atthe th the Bethel Bethol and Now New YOlk Yak homes o of Thomas W V Brander manufacturer she had neon Mrs Stoke Stokes Willi wit h at tho Bethel home o or C and at both the n Brans Brendel clot homes home at nt parties partle Sho She denied torI Mrs s Stokes Stol e and Wallace allace had slept at and Mr or er moved d to strike out her entire on the ground that she h had no nl evidence to otter offer bearing on o n a a statutory crime Supreme I Court oCourt Justice Mahoney said ho he was inclined to favor the motion when l Ip M er after a hurried conference other of ot Mrs Stoke staff of ot lawyers announced hl he had no objection to the Jury lI t to Mrs Carters Carter l I to this show of genor- genor generosity shouted Mr I Proceed with the te testimony Mr Ir said Ju Justice leo Mahoney I |