Show I- I RECTOR GIVEN I SHARP REBUKE Rev Grant Is Compared To ToMan ToMan ToMan Man Who Gambles With Trust Fund CHICAGO Jan The 31 31 The attitude of the church toward the Rev Percy Grant of ot New York Is descrIbed it II an editorial by the tho Rt lit Rev Irving p Johnson D D Episcopal bishop ot of Colorado In the January 31 Issue ot of The Th Witness a I national weekly ot of the Episcopal copal church Rev Rov Dr Johnson Johnson John John- son on say says lay bEES bEKS THING NOTHING NEW When the Rev Pel Pei cy oy Grant nt throws discredit upon the facts of 01 our Lords Lord's Lord life lite there ther Is I nothing novel or startling In what he ho says ys excepting the th tact fact that he h So says av s as aa on hD has ha pledged himself to be b a I witness of ot the tho faith once for tor all delivered ered to the tho th saints It If the th church proceeds proceed against him It le Is I not because the th church Is IK particularly particularly interested In hl hi his intellectual dews lews w but solely solly because he lr Is 15 betraying betray betray- betray In ing a trust tru L reposed In him and which ho accepted to set et forth the faith a as athi this church has h s received the tho same sarno ame Nor I 11 IC there ther any particular move In the th Anglican church to limit tree free freedom tre dom dom of ot speech excepting as a that free treo- freedom free freedom dom of ot speech pe ch proceed from who have havo accepted a trust at her hands It It Is I much the th game IAmo as aa a the tho attitude or of the th United StAtes go emment nt to- to toward toward to toward ward the th discussion ot of the eighteenth amendment It doe does not abridge the greatest freedom of ot speech when It requires require it Its judge to abstain ab from floUting the tho th law Jaw on their judicial bench COMPARISON MADE Of Ot course coun those tho who look upon the church merely merly as a school ot of philosophy cannot tee ilee the th matter from the standpoint of ot a churchman who ho 1 y r o looks look upon her ministers as a guardians of a II trust The Th difference enco Is that between a aman aman aman man who ho uses use his hla personal tOI fortunes tunes In a speculative enterprise and a 0 trust tru officer who risks his trust funds In wildcat speculation The former Is I well voll within his legal rights the tho latter Is guilty of ot criminal negligence In the ot of his trust |