| Show who before told so straight a tory IS NOW W bookel TO OKEl sir diaries aids iliin dudly hansn ami avid xi iv ADDRESS salm a lair appal fr aj aej a listar BT to anic m bunell flirl eisolt brosi fire Cf tonita LONDOT LO reb sa the courtroom was vr oded again this morning when ahe parnoll commission assembled the cross of cioll vms lie admitted writing alio letter to which sir charles pro dured and which alie that the documentary and personal to bs before llie auld be ren dfred ly ahn exposure of atie doeu B by in li it had ix en obtained at ann suggestion it presiding ans ix e clonnan ll onnan waists letter to a biti of atai arpad miia read the referred to alio llio fact that thera bad kieen lying tho recci viii letter iio daiil eliat alien lio broto to alio in very dib treated circumstances owin ti eliav WK rece ivil no money from alio witnesses work biad lieen neglected and lost ire broto ti walsh hoping lie wulim the matter to the members of alio house of commons ami bliem to provide the ditl willi huchto leae the country in return for alie in for mallou alio ittner itt nea vad startled unil pur lie letters lit ha nii and on idebel artt oreali lre ali li he wrote to narong ly that aliis letter be prud ned houston here said lie lad fo n it on amin ilott voluntarily 1 I anay fay at once hie digiulo to illi vere atna hta ft n sir diaries kiihl to pfau ly arte liea tim ici lied well cs lS nid the cx laivo no knitli witness very ahl I 1 sorbet what I 1 meant wien arole to as liar pcs acre a what I 1 he lilied to ho true and tho witness kiil lie knew aliat pro when ho roti ronld nullify bliem by ho d ly it nas alio not say aliat lift proceedings vcr otobe taken for he imagined thy etere fur in alie but luiere waa no foundation for tho statement alie again brolo to archbishop on abay olf cring kittier uit tier information in reply letter alio archbishop raid 1 I understand yon anro anxious to niao a statement 0 o assist alo victims of fraud and slander by espolin espo hin alio fraud and slander I 1 cannot refuse to accept puch a statement fully I 1 bour assurance that on took no part in alie publication the v atness said he forgot writing the statement ir charles read alio llio letter dated may gilt to archbishop galsti in which pigott to make a personal written statement alie witness admitted making tho statement to Anh bishop between may etli and iliin etli he biad to archbishop receil lr but denied clial lie biad dune BO in anler to agun obtain a britten statement pir charles l reab a letter irm to diott alite 0 may etli n wacl llie archbishop oaid he eliat ingolt knew the ahlbor of the fraud or knew aliat had tadeu to procuro tan fraudulent tha anter paid lie did not ui the name of the mau who was at the of alio matter sir charles praised llie aut atho reluctantly admitted lie had in mind alien lie wrote bigott baid lie biad forgotten alie letter but admitted lie must have written it not abo lightest aa to what importance alie matter was un leing hard pressed and alter fenc inc he admitted lie must leavo received nn anwer pir sell read rom alie letter froin to ean written february in it was tilled aliat lie alcott Il cott biad received anonymous lattora front two gentlemen alio would call upon and submit to rinolt a proposal greatly to his advant ai e they carac but to agne jamea they had an interview li islina two hours during they asked hun to publish a statement was an out lilibel about alio spending of lamo funda and was to ho BO constructed thalita publication would do inucci hiarm lie cudei he aas badly lu want of X aioo but would be satisfied willi in addition to already rent in cons of his paper concluded ills letter by baing lud as I 1 am 1 truly say 1 leavo lieen trim to those w ho trusted nie fling liter raid kan and alto money laughter on danli etli w botn to agan giving alie litte ul to sir charloa ailed who was iho fabricator atio witness lio did not know sir charles aokes i did you believe thare was a fabricator witness no this caused laughter the witness heru produced a letter from bigott to tam laid william forster secretary for irel tirl dated luno 2 ifasi in which offered forchter impera which he paid on id break up die league or jck 00 tim w luiea raid tho raw ol 01 urn i pter printed ly deik iii hid M ns re ditora arro linn 1 un ler on to accept atie at idling justice hannant Hanna nr sir charles 11 agreed ti rend nele lions from tho letters in of alio olioli sl ioli of alie witness continuing paid that lin haid been in f arnita finco iffie and anxiously turned to every quarter lor money sir charles produced n aitch cf letters written by bigott to efin ini hiding one ft niton on 1 ehni arv fc ISSO in chih hie writer asked tefie libin an at write to lie w lipil to communicate on a mailer of vital sir Cli arles quoted from alie letter written bv libott li iott to valli slay irth alio llio raid lie could not oaf v hat alie latest intentioned in tie letter meant lie only reinerd tiered mailing one namely that lie had hadi letters kiib opinion been asked as to the of the felters lel lie had that the letters credited to barnell were rather chis statement created a sensation in alie court room the that lie would not he biad not told aruar bishop walsh that the letters were forgeries laughter lie doubted the authenticity of alie letters because lie did not know the of the bodies of them lie heliend helie cd he told archbishop lie die agan letters ere genuine but would nut swear that he did lie was not oure whether blonston llo doubts aal to alie i of the letters it aa not to houstons Hous tons that the witness offered to obtain tho money sir charles read from a letter to Ardi bishop from in which lie alaid 1 I trust will do me the jussim to believe 1 am not the of the letters as is alleged lie also act cited in the letter thit lin would see if he the statement lie would set IM and that tho fonse iw lie would le roin palled to attempt lie offer unless lan assisted him llan h lalli iiii replied that lie regarded aliu letter ats a threat and declined an tiling if lie donld sir charles kuell read jeans drift of ft iatter written ou a lly loaf of letter the alie first words was identical with the version of leans letter of june lath 1831 amt the date of the of alo tubie tui ie version was ojune etli and june lah the admitted that lio similarity was remarkable bir charles lie witness re lardin beveral similar in the the letters agan had written to and alie loett ra algott had supplied houston alie witness admitted eliat sir Cliar lens copies to b correct lie would not adinie alie coin were pank ini alie capici lio eaid might leave leen forged gilld lie got over o men wera in tte bahit of ansing alie admitted ho the ord tho lie beli eiel alie knowledge that january sha similarly the bori and in biewen liis mind tim letter alid not come liia possession antil alie af he could not account for the of heri in his own after I 1 biad declined ti employ liim on alo staff of trainman he licked a arkal named Mea glier to in barnell sr Cli arles the to meagher and out n times let leis I 1 e then aliel nl iel alio witness if was not of bigott replied littly under the circumstances no it ia scandalous eliat I 1 should elins ha questioned I 1 did not forge the if I 1 did I 1 should not lie here produced the written by bigott to in for a loan after writing in aich bigott ii leaded poverty foster gent 1100 as a private loin time later faa a matter of personal sympathy foster loaned 60 to enable him to go to america did not go lion ever but renewed his application for money until foster granted him an interview sir charles Kii produced letter after letter including lg for a loan of to enable him to go to australia until the became dazed and forgot everything the commission then adjourned |
