Show R over 0 ver title to carbon V coal band land in hi highest hest court ge ariment clah went to sleep bleep an on job de renso on coal alleea TATE STATE CONTENDS TITLE TO lalta baltes NOW CLEO attorney general oluff cluff in brial brief yf De declares claret lap lapse 0 o of time has made grants valid vaud in car carbon abon tho ali title of the independent hotl ind coke company and tha carbon county land company to acre in carbon cattily was argued thil this week la in the th supreme court at washington D p the government if to trying to recover the land jam in carbon founty va a vilta thel tb satt wilt will collect 2 13 it tho th court decider against 1 ta the ith C united stated 4 argual ae presented atea by the dav coal and land wa that if the fed oral cral gi eminent goci goes to leop sleep on 01 16 tight i nd na by its it own neglect allow allows the state of utah to uro a food good title to valuable tract of coal land under its it school laul grant it cannot complain at leit it apt it cannot export legal legat redress if the wile it ite later around and sells all le tho te Alu 1 ablo lauti lands forup or adward of calfi A million 1 11 nor can it expect the courts to make amends for or lapses on the parl par of its it own administrative officials fici fiel als it Is I 1 hold the tit AN johnpaul joi npaul j and the title arg ar peeving t ajeet nilde the decision of dio pilo filver earl court fth liL ani ties L tiled the state states contention th hit ti the iund jail been fraudulently and that it wa was entitle A to re to aver them the usa I 1 states roade made it plain that it dh did bit aldge that utah ua fraudulently land but asserted that the tb tate h ta leca been ira posed upon au kl iucci ilc alecil ecil ci O 0 f 4 land 44 aku ove wab U Influence A tl alib 4 fou aine aa ua and could no be of the state 1 20 yem in courts 4 in one forra form or other over this 28 29 acre la in carben hal ha r been boford a the couitt for M more ore aba than twenty vears but now it did not reach the be 17 U 8 supreme ourt it came or appe 0 from the decision of the cit cult court of appeals for the eighth circuit which had bad the dg decision cIslon of the halted states dietrict ct court of ut th mahlon 2 eoln ahoon of salt uke 00 nadel made the af as counsel for tco tat indea eident r 0 m by V alfted wheat A special a the attorney general argued ed for or the t e government v i and frank X r formerly of salt lake and BOW itow of washington dawd ai all counsel far r the cubon county land timid company better known es e ai milner latt inUre rests iti attorney cimeral harva 11 aluf of who alo e t in to in ter gertene tene djs case on brief and did att participate in the argument it was wo brought out in A argument lint hat the ile federal gme in 1904 erti ajol 1 to the bitite of butali certain lands ider ue its so hool grant vl ilch the tie state in in turn urn sold to 11 milner for sla LIO an acre it being taa represented el that tte land lands were lu in exar acter T th lind lands inter later were 1 i ferbej to tho carbon county land lana con com i pa PAI to in which ati acel all but of ot the shared hare ct of toek government GuTen ment suit the government gorr in 1907 luit suit for the of tho the of pf ale vale os the ground bat the sad ai verp mineral land lands and ana ach aeh ati Atthe theo tim tinn 3 of their election selection bl b the state in 1014 set eca ca 0 4 A uter later the district court for utah canceled the Coutin continued uel on fajr t 8 SUPREME COURT HEARS COAL LAND ARGUMENTS from page 1 I contrary ami anti held tit tint it the united wa wn the I 1 aner and entitled 0 fo o the posse lilon M the nas as affirmed on appeal and there stolpen i 1 it was the contention of tin tit o 0 gol ernaut that the th decree in question established title to this baj in the united li states tates but the ml coal coir omphie inick and the state in its it brief maintain th hit thit it the state of utah wa was rot tot a part to the litigation of 1007 1907 1914 therefore not tot bound nor afflicted by it anil an tint that the role sole effect of that decree I 1 as I 1 ti I 1 annul the sale to the company and to serve notice on the federal authorities that they had pounds grounds for attacking the states title for some nason not developed derc loped the government never brought suit alt to can eel the states title not no made nn nav moe to the otate title and in III 1920 tl e state wider a new contract cost tl issal to the th carl carrity land lud rim at t it i arite i bt bf ht ncr acre uhe C III origin il air jh tb la anu it id bai 1111 0 oly t I 1 dawod transfer anifer Tr r the th I 1 tin ik etor unit brought still it to ahr th imd in lie the lav 1 i cok in the 1111 11 vinit aeo lArN 11 1120 20 irrea 1 of 11 from the carbou bounty compa ii 0 in III the witt ourt tile lie RO go cri crit tnt senis bill 11 4 largely on the rousi 1 that th tin t stute of li lii iltz fitak ind hid the gme but lout this ruling m aft as ri bi alie fir cult alt court of appeals find 1 tile t MM we 1 I brought to alv v I 1 it coal i pankie pan kii uw late of itah interim ing and a it party to the liu liti for the firm time cerniant funnel tont eadd lint thit tuf two balag MI I 1 the carbon count rum cum F au te 1 othur in int irod trestA mere nod the first having been ilce Joe lami hired frau deleat tin tho taint of raud natu naturally rilly e ir r tied to the wiil second and pending uit suit counsil for the eo foil LI cm mia laul ilic rind the tile state maintained that hat tin two 1 ere Fel larate a A d di stivel the tint hain bein a cje at an wre I 1 alc tlc Leiti toil talc auto was wa babe d un 08 what tile plate thru 38 a the vain nine at of the lie landas land a bauit o 0 o 0 the lie windi ration itaas ha a to tiu nott notes given atte I 1 in III lieu of basho uh the tile arbou hadj a tulua on 1 gate gavetia the a LlOrt gagO and virt notes not ci or J payable januar 2 IN out for Vo paralle tea tc ve o 0 later and I 1 d for 2 1 lal in ipa lct interest cret a to alx beg I 1 til bonu iry 2 1 1925 the cua and tile atilleo Atille 1 0 4 1 1 Argi argument rn ment I 1 a the talk o 0 r netlon n 4 I 1 on th let that the atiat had run aa 11 int tn ilia o 0 to erni nent info 0 abe bo lu III t K Is to girn and therefore the a a stales Is U barred g the he it itric tj I 1 or mocking aar MIP pale fio li itic might faro care to mat mavi lian jhen the baited d st a ought 11 all alfy ly KO 0 to li tt ante title the talc state lileton lileT title 1 had absolute bv I 1 labog lip time paa I 1 the brief of if C ral rat cluff adding the ti that whitt vrr 0 rit lit I 1 tiny ed 1 in the ae avitt d state states ai 21 gaunt tid dg itan stutt s title by reason of W error laiful been extinguished by of I 1 the st itule of limitation 1 the more wt we read hout 1 chai more thankful we are that I 1 ne bk 1 in the unada state |