| Show W william illiam wodrow woodrow found not guilty of helper burglary testimony of defendant admits awful drunk but dis claims knowledge of robbery after aft listening to the evidence pre by the th tate state of uth la in the william woodrow we case wednesday the tho jury in the district court of the sey nth judicial district dia tritt brought in a cr er diet of not guilty to tho the charge of third digree burglary which bed hed been file alle I against tle 1 rimer testimony in the tw brought out the fad fact that woodrow had bad been eon con ably intoxicate on thai that occasion pe admitted the fact and in a remark ably dear story told of hie lis early ran wall berini and find in all intimate mate unconscious aie ness ke ile told th buirt of hi his anion iii the follow ing morning by toy V A I knobbs chief of police of liell aider ere va how bow he be responded to the put to him b bs the officer he ile told t if f hta i and of 0 his hi re e arre S t U ue e to boid A of hie him ties ani hh his by chief knols knobbs but he lie hated stated time after time that he know nothing of the fait fact that the Y M C J A bad had been tinted visited and that he be hd etolen stolen a i terse and other articles artl fleg from the he railroad em hilt he hat ha 1 been o 0 under the influence fo the chief knobby testified to finding the good at the room occupied by N bodrow ool row lie ile stated that be lie bid bad known woodrow for three fierce vear rears ani had never hal lint any occasion cation oc tu to suspect bim of any crime bodrow admitted that the good goods were found by mr knobbs at the room where be he hal hat stayed bi bajt t disclaimer el knowledge of the in butter itter the jun jum evidently believed beli ered tie story of row for or he wai wits re laed lessed by them after a brief consideration of the evidence |
