Show the e honto and the tho castle cadle IT T Is an old principle pria ciple of the english common law lair that amans A mans home ii his castle and cannot ba b invaded by peace officers without A search war rant based upon actual evi evidence dince of law violator vio laton or presence of 0 a lar lair violator within it il that has be come a part of jur own common law supported by the constitution and b it all statutes statute arc are construed however the question of what constitutes a home haa has never been definitely determined As A the bus esa dytrt ds of a city extends residences arc are con scantly being con arted into stores and factories the is 13 eflin gradual the tile place being till still lived in ili wink while work or shop is ii conducted when docs does bucl 1 a place to be le a residence and wi titled to the tle sanctity of a houe home and become a factory or place of bu busmen in aas t A federal judge I 1 an recently decided that a house empt except for hav liar ing in it ii 4 still in legal illegal opera tion whose presence there the owner of the houie hoube swore ho he did not know ani a residence and could not be amaded with a search earch warrant arrant iv without better cadence on to found the warrant than smelling Rm elling odora odors of alcohol ln in other words the court extended to hn this empty hodve in which bior wae was going on all the sanctity of nn on actual honi common sense would dictate that A place is iq net ilet nail what it is being libin mod for and not for what it was originally origin aliv built saloons bae ican 1 opened in 11 old ehu cn all and few would mould still hold that they aeola c con n tinned to be churches like reason reasoning ning gnp would a to bo be arlien the of liquor I 1 ir I 1 earned carried on in in a house that had ceased ewed to be a home in fact was for nn no other than the oper atlon of a stil still whether or not rose evidence la is as rood good as thai that of any other of the file fie natural sense senses is another que question tion the ml point in this eft case te is i that the court held this place to be ile a it residence in ili spite of lie the fact that it was not a aeng umed as but for illegal manufacturing dw the castlo doc dol e trine extend that far 0 |