OCR Text |
Show n a blanket. "J " y ' pj EST JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT. rr. FamAVi Sf pt. 3; 8 a.m, oumr mtt'purasnt Io aJjoarnmenL ha cf of llenry Maeaully vs. Chaj. S, k; Perry Co. . Whj. Liughly 4t dam- , I ;' John Sieward. v. Charles Iltrrltonj John i chlaon vs. ilowEl'wfn D. Vyebb'vi. Waih- ce oa Jolly, and other were call'd. of I ate of John G. Irwin vs. John AI. Butter, 1 "appeal from 'the Probate Court of Cedar ( )y, ' ' C 1 answer to the mouon to dismiss or two 'I ses- Wl "That tald defendant, Boiler, liad do later- a't( in' the land that could be conveyed by 'roort- eou deedA" W ' The Probate Coart.had no jutUdlction to 1 , try, or 'Slerinitellil action. ' foil he Judge saldi In delermlalog thli motion Gt court will judicially take notice that the title andVfri this Territory U in , "the United tha eg," ,Iudlidual without having any right thai lle.to the !jnI, have ntf fed upon, Improved Y01 MMsei1on can be trantferred only byde- cm rryie another, and U may or may not be la- ty. !ei by dd bat a party Is poieIoa( eta o r b tflef oatetfed by the governateat of ttie (m Iteti Sute unlcw the reletlon of leheMoftt afid 1 ant elif, la this cite thera I no saefc re- M oa. Thla orlage to therefor voR m a we artty for tho debt, and ctnBot be enforced jec (nit tie mortgaged propel t) j but it dora not fur think follow that thUcauit ahoald for thai (o; loo ho'dlsmheed, for tinder the eotsot the ft Vitorlai JgislatBren 1 am of opinion that the etii bate CoU,t ml'ht have glvm Judfment for Uti mortgage debt agalnit tbe mofigsgor, al- ott ugh the eecortty vrn void K lbey bad com- 1 r law and chahcery jurUdlction-- and tbbj eta ng ras to conldr the eeuond' point Urged for eoi diemlisal of this cause., rhe.Jfuge remarked that the Territorial Le cot ature.aafar as It fid ft power, had mat?e IbJ Probate Court the superior tribansls of the aw cqnnlry, glvtog them excjiiilire poer la lh erii, Instance, and amqng'otberathatof se liogiuror, and judging ot! their quililicatioita. qu fdmo ipattcreih Prohale Court had, oriqor-iyoi t jurladlcllon With the prttrlct CourU, and or re by law always open' pre leati, ior holding Diatilcl Court, and the (ic 1 for officers and' wi(nfsfs in e,uch courts, e"ii r. subject to the ptessur ot the Probste fro irt,, aud that Jf, the Organic, Act' aulhorid ' X,;iilature 16 confer such powers on tbe Hit bate Court, the Diitricf Court mutt submit, car be Judge then read the 9:haecllonof the Or- Tei C Act, whfch, he ald, veted tha entire jtidi- by power of the Territory ia four diflaient tha anat Supreme Court, District Court, Pro. of I iCouit, and Jnitlce of 'he Peace. D.itermin- be the qnallfications of jurors was a judicial bill , Creating another tiibunal, and invfaiingln am! owert belonging to others, violated the Or- coi tc Act. Supreme and Diatrict Courts' had 1 imon Uw and clisnctry power. Tho Act did the give tuch power 'to: the Pfoba,e. Co'uffB, we igret. cduld not intend to create two tribu. ter i .with concurrent powers, or It would have PI nepetllled. There va no necessity for such tne unals. Supreme and DUtflcl Courts bad imon law and chancery power, the powers ' 1 i'rdbate Conrta were limited to the probate ot ec i and' teatament. the adm!nIfratlon of de- tio dent estates, elc. TfteTrrit,ortal.Leglstature be id crtate nootlier, Supretae Cotirt with the l rbr ther6f, a well e a tribunal .witff piitrlct pre irt powers;- Coi?Rreconferrd'the jirtdfc- Ihi i5of tbse .tribun'al.c, Iti tbe i exercise. thereof, th Urglilalure had .power, to impose certbln I(m aa, for ,lntari'cf;;4li. the' juraictlon';of the I licta of !tne'peaeetnit'eieeedfugV ijtOp.' Tjie Ini ;'latute , could Jlmit thatauih ta 'fSOt&O- tin a.Territorial Legtalalure could aaVorialitent- xi create anotherlrgialttttfe or 'executive depart a.si nt otlihe government,. w'Jth.theyowera tlwte- bu as to create judicial tribunal.' Co'iigreM evi- itly inlendeu, lu iiio judicial mounal?, a re U- oi gradation -'from iho hlgheit to the Igwest la V iT order named Supreme' Coiirt,,;Diitrlci y? url, Proba'te'Coorf, and jutltee of thS peace. Hreij created the coqrti and conferred. their aii atUi Tlie.'rrrito;lil LegUlatbre could. bntyly' ;uiaio the mode In .which Iho'aci powers thou Id Y exercise lf. It could, not gtvo nor take away ifee . ldlclldn;conf(rred by .thOrgnnlcAct.' T a ai Ilia honor 'con'deredthe vriou act of the,"j rrj(ori'al,Igulatur', confejilog.or aiiempiirg -confer -of-guwl coroaion' lAw and clwiicery "on iidictioii on thh Probate CourU, iiiconileat Q' 1 contrary t0(the Organic Act; and hence aulj fill I void... 3 f ' ' ' ,t ' ,J V I'he Probate. Court bavlng1 neliheVcommori In rr;orcbancery power, had no junsdictlon.of nfj t cauirj and ihat'.court not Jbav.Iflg, .by 'the a;( ieaVmore power than the tribunal from whene CameJ 'it' followed that the motion' 10 flfeinUs sf 'prevail. Tjie ittll tfiefefore was dumlfied '! he cot of tbe plaintiiT,- in the court below- Jouit toolc a rpcesa till i 1 a.m. Ux 11 ,m. i 'ourt resumed It sitting. ' 'ao of D.J. Upward v. it. Johnon called, she 5outt adjourned till to-morrow, 8 a.m. low 8ATPEnir, Spt. 4, 8 s. m j Jourt met p'uriuant to adjournment, J It honor read dree the following case: Tlie J ipleof the U. State v. "SlcDonaliJ, Earl and, eri the people of the United States vr.T.y- der Ge-j the people pf lbs .United States i John Scott et alt the people of the United jg-j tes v George Tobyj the people of tbe for tted State y, Thomas Iviet Atbe people BC the. United State VS. Aaron Johntonj JEd win WebrvkWashhigton Jolly, tttal. dr( Jourttookar,cfSllll,fip;m. . ,he ... - 5 .P- 3?nrt returned It lttirig. and. then adjourned nt neet at Carrip'tloyon the 3th " inat-to be pri lejilon there, three" day,, to. give iiatiiraJiidtfon the ter; then 14' adjourn alue die. '" ' i.t,' |