| Show JURY DECIDES NO CAUSE OF ACTION iN N WOOL CASE GASE 41 A very vory case was concluded con can concluded eluded before Judge Woolley lato late Monday afternoon It was tho the case of S. S W. W Bridges of Boston va vs W. W D D. Candland and Sons In which Bridges was trying tring to recover 2600 2600 2 24 of money paid to Candland and Sons and the latter was trying to collect which Mrs Candland Candland Candland Cand Cand- land considered was yet duo mini hIm The jury was given the case at about 7 o'clock Monday l evening and was In deliberation until 1 o'clock before a verdict of no cause causo of action both on the thc complaint and counterclaim counterclaim was brought The chairman of the jury Jacob Thompson Thomp- Thomp son did not sign the verdict rho Those e signing were Homer Sidwell Reid Nielson Archie R. R Anderson John JohnR R. R R Rees William P P. P Stewart Elmer Jensen and Leo Anderson In 11 brief the case was wag about as lS follows fellows On May 24 21 1929 W W. D D. D Candland and Sons Sous consigned their wool through an agent to S S. S W W. Bridges Co Co A contract contra t was signed and Mr Ir Candland was given an advance of 20 cents per pound which amounted to Wool at thu tha time was selling at about 32 cents per pound It appears from tho the evidence that the wool In question was as not scoured and sold until some time In January 1930 at which time the bottom had dropped out of Qt f the price of wool S. S I W. W Bridges Co claim that at the date dato o of tho the salo sale the wool had cost them about and they received for Cor it about Because of ot this loss they claimed a refund from Candland Sons according according according ac ac- ac- ac cording to the contract as they in interpreted interpreted In in- It o a f 2600 On the other othor hand Candland Sons Sans maintained that had ad the wool been sold at an early date as stated in to the agents letter to S. S W. W Bridges ridges there would have been duo due them from the margin between and the selling JH price ice above th the tho cost o of handling 2800 2500 and they were making a caunter cunter claim claie for Cor this amount The Instructions to tree the j jury ry pointed out six questions upon which they were t to make make decision a Did the plaintiff agree to cli t wool at an early date b Did the plaintiff agree to sell the wool within 60 days after delivery dell deli very ery of wool to it c Did the plaintiff agree that there s should be no right to recover money from the defendants to reimburse reimburse relm burse it ft for money advanced to defendants defendants defendants de de- and expense incurred in handling the he wool d Was Vas the right of tho plaintiff to reimburse from the defendants J for money advanced and expenses expenses- Incurred d In any wa way limited and if it so 50 to what extent 0 o Did the plaintiff agree to give the sale of this woo wool its special attention It is tb thought that S. S W. W Fridges will ask for a a. new now trial |
