Show GIES 4 1 ARGUMENT BEFORE OIL CONSER BOARD STRESSES t scientific PLANS government i rement legislative interference deplored findings next move problems doth both economic Econ and leoil legal K washington tho federal oil conservation board which 14 1 endeavoring to shape a policy defining tho the governments ern orn ments attitude toward tho oil industry heard final arguments anil and began preparing its report charles ha K representing the american petroleum institute summed up tor for tho the group advocating encouragement coura gement ot of scientific effort and avoidance of legislative interference while L doherty of now york spokesman for those urging conservation measures was given permission to file a rebuttal statement to mr nighos argument contending that federal legislation to regulate oil production would bo be unconstitutional mr flushes pointed to scientific effort as aa its salvation and declared the tha cracking process through which gasoline Is mado made from crudo crude oil had bad doubled tho the count rys potential gasoline supply tho great service that this board can render la Is to bring about art an intelligent tell toll igent conception on the pat part t of tile tho public of the facts relating to tho the industry and its problems problem 9 both economic and legal mr declared declare and to foster the in katlyna upon upon which ultimately tile tho conservation of our vastly important oil resources must depend while not totally disagreeing with mr II statement mr doherty said lie ho dif fored front from him on all important port arit points and assorted asserted that those who bay aay there Is a plentiful supply ot ol petroleum should tiring bring in something moro more definite so ho he could answer them political atlon mr assorted la is superficially attractive but difficult and unlikely to succeed succo od something might be accomplished by removing legal obstacles to intelligent operation scientific effort holds the tha promise of tho the future tho the cracking process has done more for conservation than and legislative scheme could tie do under our constitution 11 r i |