Show A pure merchandise rr c T ar law Q the pure food law has blazed t the h e nv way i y f for 6 r ft a latof ladof w wider addi e range tin 0 ge applied to all line af uro ure writes J harry selz the chicago shoe manufacturers manufacturer in the current sample yam pie case we need afar reaching fig law a misdemeanor A to able 0 le by fine or imprison imprisonment ai or both for any manufacturer U adf taa tb misrepresent besent in any ways way the goods he makes vv ay jay ind indeed Qed s should we b 0 specific and limit this demand for fai honesty in manufacture to uny liny an one e li line n e of lines surely if t I 1 1 t i 4 honesty I 1 is s ri right in ht in the manu fact ure of foods ani and drugs itis it Is right for clothes and shoes in al ail 1 merchandise we ought then to put the words all merchandise instead of foods and drugs in the law we e ought to extend the principles of and protection for common honesty in all forms of trade when this is lone done the abuses of substitution adulteration fraud will pass away y |