Show WAS GOOD ENOUGH REASON Accused Mans Man's Lawyer Asserted His Clients Client's Innocence So Wh What t Was There for Jury to Do The following stOl story ether either shows extreme Ignorance on the tine part of a 1 Juror or It shows what a wonderful harm charm some w h lawyers r exercise exercise- on a u Jury said a former marshal of a 0 southern Indiana elt city A A murder was committed and It was r riot t. t lon long before we had the man who who eve we were sure had committed the deed But he lie had money and he retained retained re re- the best lIest lawyers The two lawers lawyers lawyers law law- ers we will call White and Black lack because because be he- cause White and ond Black BInd arc not their real names The jury jUl was made up largely largel of men who tilled the time soil The They were of the honest hOliest sort White and Black mack especially White so presented presented pre pre- seated t their clients client's case caRe telling how he could coul not do such a 0 horrible deed deell using their handkerchiefs occasionally In the telling that the jurors were carried carried carried car car- ried away and voted for fOl acquittal Later I m met t one of the jurors and andI I said to him Jones Jone wh why you ou vote to acquit the prisoner The evidence evidence evi evi- dence showed clearly that he was gu guilty No sir that man was not guilty said Jones What mal makes es you rou think so 50 I countered Why because e Mr 11 White said he lie wasn't l' l concluded e Jones Tones |