OCR Text |
Show Objections to the Use of Glasses. fomo iKJopIo object to glasses, ulnlm-liiK ulnlm-liiK that onco put on tho oyea they cannot can-not beo without thcin. Tho argument hiw no logical basis A cripplo doea not throw wide lilscriilclies bcT-atiso ho becomcH ho lined to their lino thut ho cannot walk without them. If after putting on glassc.-) tho wearer finds It illllluult to go without them, thli simply proves that beforo ho vvoro tho KlasMes ho was forcing his oyes lw-youd lw-youd Uio limit of safety, u practice, which, if continued, In stiro to nllect thoHiKlit. If pnlu or discomfort enn bo avoided, why should glimae- not bo steadily worn, oven if tho naked eyo cnuiiot bo strained bo far its It could vvcro tho gliiftses not used? To rodtico tho overgrown in melon so therucatibo no ryo Btrnin, no innttor how lmrd Iho owner ot llio eyes may try to misuse them, Is certainly iv very good thing. The claim tlialputtliigou glu-wet makes tlieni ii continual necessity, mid Ihory-foro Ihory-foro Is to bo avoided us long ns possible, Is very poor logic. Many eyes nro not oxnotlv of tho right pio-wtioiH optically, and when with Increasing ago tho Internal ocular muscles com-nieiice com-nieiice to grow hard, and sight consequently con-sequently begins to fail, suitable glasses should bo obtained at once. 'There nIioiiIiI bo no delay. It is u mlwlnlui to wait. Tlio Instant you notleo the least dillloulty of vision liuvo your eyes lltled wlllt glnssert J. II. Sehey, tlio Optician, will lost your eyes free Inquire nt Merrlhew'H Drug Wore, I.olii, or Now (Jrniit Hotel, Am. Fork. |