| Show THE N L it 11 IN AMION ACTION there rite many who tire lire ready to defend the national labor relations board which tho e national labor relations act against the charge that the board Is one ridell favoring lit in its dellb 1 ernt ions tho the case of tho the employee these defenders assert that the Je harges against the board are always generalities 11 ono one witness appearing before the ibe semite committee on oil education and labor considering amend ments to tile tho national labor re intsons act abad one piece of testimony mony which certainly however cannot he be considered generalities lie he was explaining the ftp ap perance pearn nce of ills his company comp anys lawyer j or beloro before the board before which tin the company jitta had been summoned the witness Ss testified 1 when lie beg began in ills his argument T n at the of the board two questions the first one I 1 wilo wn you hail had ft a strike you the answer was yes yea the next ru estion wits na the men inen are arc still out me are they not the answer was some of them the chair mail then said well what else to Is there to this case it la Is doubtful that evoil the keen est defenders of tle the board could disprove such it 11 remark ns as And icat ing blas iani it would certainly likewise seem to prove the charge that the board proceeds on oil the assumption tion that hint strife must be the basis yf of employer employee relations in I 1 tile the united states |
