Show THE DIFFERENCE Some few days ago the state chemist was given something of a chemical nut to crack when one of the Deputy Food Inspectors Inspectors Inspectors In In- took a cake of maple sugar he lie had picked up at a prominent gr grocery cery The ordinary layman would imagine that the dif- dif fe of maple and cane sugars through chemical analysis of the cake would be comparatively an easy matter but the chemist says it is one of the most difficult things to do for the reason that the chemical chemical chemi- chemi cal leal constituents of all sugars are alike whether the sugars be cane maple or beet The formula is the same in all all' three viz On that is 12 parts of carbon 22 of and 11 of oxygen Though this would signify that all sugars sugars sugars sug sug- ars are the same and it would not make any difference e which was used it is not so Physiologically Physiologically Physiologically Phy Phy- and medicinally different sugars though similar in some respects act differently differently differently differ differ- when taken internally The chemists have their right to claim all sugars are chemically alike but as stated before their uses are not the same nor their actions actions' alike |