OCR Text |
Show ADDITIONAL CASES IN DISTRICT COURT Judge Morris Clears Calendar of Cases Ready for Hearing and Opens Term in Beaver. The regular April term of the district dis-trict court was completed on Saturday Satur-day afternoon, and Judge Morris left tho next day for Beaver where ho will open court on Mondny the 26th at 2 o'clock. In addition to tho business transacted tran-sacted as heretofore published the following cases and matters were disposed dis-posed of: In the case of Zella Ehrlich vs, Joseph Ehrlich; the plaintiff was granted an interlocutory decree, and awarded all 'the furniture nnd im-provments, im-provments, nnd all the interest her hlislriiid may have, acquired -in a curtain cur-tain homestead near Beryl in this county. Also $30 u month alimony, $100 attorney's fees and costs of this action. Tho plaintiff was also restored re-stored to her maiden name, Zella Carter. In the, matter of tho estate of James N. Condic, deceased. Order authorizing administratrix to execute conveyances to certain lands in said estate. In estate of Orilla Williams, deceased. de-ceased. Letters of administration issued to John II. Williams, upon his filing a bond in $G00. In estate of Stephen L. Barton, deceased. Decree discharging the administrator ad-ministrator entered upon his paying to the clerk money due two minor heirs. In estate of Wilson Dealy deceased. Older directing ndmisistrntrix to execute ex-ecute conveyances for real estate, and an order of sale of real property. Stato of Utah vs. William Wilson. This case was brought to confiscate certain wine found in tho possession of the defendant and seized by Sheriff Sher-iff Froyd. An order was entered confiscating con-fiscating and destroying tho liquor and directing the sheriff to sell the containers. Henry Gurr and Thomas Davenport, Daven-port, vs. Edwin R. Adair nnd Robert Rob-ert Thorloy. This case occupied the attention of the court during the last two days of tho session. In plaintiff's plain-tiff's first cause of action it was alleged that plaintiff sold nnd deliv-ered deliv-ered to the defendants in May, 1018, certain sheep for which a portion of the purchase price had not been paid; and in their second cause of action it was alleged that the defendants unlawfully un-lawfully took and carried away said sheep to the damage of tho plaintiff, and that a certain portion of the dam-i dam-i age had not been paid. After the plaintiff had been allowed to present their evidence in support of the com- : (Continued on last pnge.) ADDITIONAL CASES IN DISTRICT COURT (Continued from first pnge.) plaint tho court required tho plaintiffs plain-tiffs to elect upon which count they would stand, nnd they elected tho second count. Thereupon a counsel for Thorlcy moved for a non-suit on the ground that tho evidence did not support the pleadings, nnd it appearing appear-ing to the court thnt there wns no unlawful taking. but thnt Thorley had purchnscd the sh,cep nnd pnid for them, motion for n non-suit was granted. Defendant Adair, nppenr-, nppenr-, ing in his own behalf rested his case upon the case made out by the plaintiffs plain-tiffs and the court ordered inasmuch ' ns the ovidence showed thnt plaintiffs , had delivered tho sheep to Adair, and that there was no unlawful taking, the enso was3 dismissed n to Adnir at Plaintiff's costs. In estate of George Wpod, deceased tho administrator wns directed to i specifically perform the ngreements I entered into by deceased, prior to his death, and execute conveyances as prayed for in the petition. |