| Show CONTROL OF COLLEGE TEAMS present system tends to discourage initiative Initia lise and self reliance Rt liance ances points alth all due respect to our friend the professional coach we ue must adroit admit thit there Is much truth in what N hat d dent nt hibben of princeton un university hersity has lias to say on oil the subject of student control of college athletic teams the present of coaching Is the natural out outgrowth grouth of the of intercollegiate athletics and the demand nd for inning teanis by engaging expert a to assist in drilling the various artous t tanis anis the colleges liae taken out of the hands of the placers th themselves em selves the work ork of team development and it Is now nov the generally accepted practice to allo allow the coaches to direct every cry detail of 0 pla doctor hibben docs does not believe that responsibility for the work ork of the team should be divert ed from the placers actually in the game and placed altogether on the shoulders of those oh oft the tile side lines he thinks the team captain should direct its dov development elop ment and st stile le of play one of the results of the modern tice he lie sais sa a bas been to discourage initiative and a if reliance which he regards as essential essert ial points in a college training say sayf lafayette courier un the tile stand the princeton president haa has taken will be approved by many educators and not a fc few lead era in college athletic affairs |
