Inter-Mountain Republican | 1906-05-11 | Page 5 | Answer Magnolia Suit.

ANSWER r MAGNOLIA SUIT j- j jv v Silver Siler u Kin Kin- ill ic That runt t It Took rOOk OieS Ore Oro S Not ul Jl Its Own On An Answer wel to the suit uit of r the Io Mining company against the Silver King Mining coman company David I Keith S and Thomas I Kearns has been filed d In iii Inthe tile the United States tates court The Thc complaint com coni- 5 plaint of the Magnolia Ia nolla company S charged ged defendants with sith tlc trespass pass and ind wit with Jl unlawfully n la ext extracting from prop pIO mt of erty-of it of plaintiff ores oles valued at OUO 1 was ht to recover damages damin dam dam- ages in jn three limes this amo amount Jl or JUU S. S an d by 1 defendant S. S n a t c complete i 1 denial tn is lIS wale made madelo waleto S 5 to lo th the allegations e set l- l forth in the theS S complaint It H is denied that they theys s J J entered upon the ground of or plaintiff y 5 1 nd extracted ores Oles and Is alleged Ile ed that all ores fire extracted from 55 The ITIC territory in ill controversy contlo belon belonged S 34 to tile the Silver Sil King ICing Mining company S Further it is 1 alleged that all the thu ores and minerals ever at any time 5 5 found or discovered in or 01 beneath the surface of the mining claims menS mentioned mentioned men men- S Untied and described in fri the thc complaint II either of them were and ar are the I and amid owned by the Silver Sliver King ICing Mining company and ad that said plain plain- hiss has ilot now nor has ilas any of Its predecessors fH's In lii title or interest ever vel had luid any estate lf right rh ht title or 01 Interest In n or t to the ores or ot minerals minerals' e eat at any ny time found or discovered 11 in 01 or beneath said mining claims or an any any of thC them l S