| Show CHAMBERS AJI GF ERRORS EnnOIS Cast nM of Former O Comm Councilman mm I Hoard In Supreme 11 Court Argument In the time cu case CUSH of J J. J D. D Sheen plaintiff and antI against Fred v. Chambers defendant t and appellant appel lant were begun before the tho Supreme court yesler yesterday ay afternoon Time The ease case as hinges on the matter mater of th time charges against t Cham Chambers IR former form form- er city councilman of Ogden accused of charging an and collecting Illegal fees on which he lie was wag tried and ant found guilty before Judge Howel o of Ogden Chambers was accused e of presenting to 0 the lime city auditor of Ogden on Jan Jaum 7 7 1901 i a u claim for fOI 50 which It was 3 charged charge was fraudulent anti and presenting pre lire another Dec 27 7 1 1904 for fur 00 both hoth amounts amount It was alleged boIng bo- bo beIng bC- bC Ing in Jim JI Cx es of his iuis salary o of 40 a year eal as councilman After the time findings of the low lower r court In which he lie was waR adjudged guilty guity Chambers appealed to time the tl Supreme Supreme Su Su- Su- Su preme prenie court basing his appeal on omm five twenty al alleged geU errors In fn the time lowel lower low low- er em court court He lie assigns ns as error eror time the In Insufficiency insufficiency In- In sufficiency of the tile evidence to Justify the time cl verdict let an and specifies the time following following follow follow- olow- olow evidence ing particulars In which the Is insufficient 1 1 The Tho evidence does not show that the time defendant acted fraudulently or corrupt corruptly In iii accepting pay imay ny for fOI services outside of his imis regular duties dutes as member mem mcm- her ber er of the city cly council counci 2 The evidence I does show that hat the time defendant performed such services exceeding ex ex- cec ln In 11 value the tIme amount received recel by him 3 The rhe evidence e does show how that hInt the time defendant t acl acted el u under a advice vice u upon on which he ime had hal a II right ht to rel rely nH and aini andIn In good goo faith believing in ble that he lie had hada hatla a right to receive such compensation 4 I The Time evidence does not flot show sho the lie taking of ot any fees whatever tr within the time meaning menning of Section Revised Statutes Stauts 8 of Utah under which El said action acton is l' l brought Attorneys s 's McMillan Corn appear for Chambers and Kimball Kimbull Kimbal Halvorsen Halvor- Halvor sen for fOI Skeen S c c t Ti i 1 |
