Show 1 I IJ BAKK HK Mrs Ir Irs Blanche E. E Knoth I of O Seeks Single ll BI O Ogden llen June H. H H.- H. Mrs rs Blanche E E. E l Knoth of if this cU city has brought ht suit stilt a against her husband Bernard G Gf G. G f Knoth In lii which which- she he asks asis that the till bonds bIdS of or matrimony I be e dl dissolved and ani that her hel maiden name I bo be restored The complaint has been drawn yb h AtI At- At I or i leys Agee J Cues Chez and anti McCraeken McCracken Jt It is understood that lint Mr Ir Knoth will iiI not hot contest st the lie suit and that ho he will allow the tue decree to bo hn granted I by y dev tic de- v fault faull or 01 confession o of Judgment x s The Tue allegations in the lie complaint are thu thiU nl huts has tU tlc the l rh 4 a ru un and tid hi izic i- i f 7 Ogden June 11 One H.-One One of the most peculiar eases cases with which the local focal tl department has had to deal lor r some time hue came caine to light this hits mornIng morn- morn lug Ing when Mrs J I Henry lenry Reed called upon up UI- on Oil them to locate S I 11 1 5 which her hel husband hus lius- band deposited with the bartender or of orth th the thic Oxford Cafe ii The rhe facts in lii the case are arc that Reed feed who Im has lH been en on a n. protracted spree for severn several days ran out of ur cash mil and went vent to the tho First National Bank nl where the motley money was tl deposited llo In the name nf pf Mrs 1 Reed feed lie He did thu not have an or order er d hilt but the money mony was given him lIe He started out with the gold in either elthier hand A newspaper man Informed the lie 1 police and was detailed de- de tailed to locate him Before Boton this was accomplished how bow tow tow- ii j ever CI Reed HeNI had deposited It with John 4 Ic the bartender at nt the Oxford and i accepted a receipt When he lie was luken taken tak- tak en Into 1110 custody he hl produced the rev re- re I. I v ZUl and was released I J Between eight and nine o'clock In Inthe the evening gd Joslin appeared at the saloon and wild said that lint Mrs Leo Lee ha had sent him for 01 the money mony The bartender on duty Iut at the time refused ll to hand It t over Lee stepped to the phone 2 ro and claims that lint Mrs 1 Hoed Heed authorized turning the money over to Joslin Joshin Tho rhe point that Is troubling roul lInS' lInS the authorities au nu- il is who Is hi responsible Joslin Joshin Il f 4 has lias ms tho the money anti Is lIal liable le to a x Inal action hut but who hio would 1 bo be 0 responsible 4 sible should a civil action be brought rought |