Show I BROWN BRON WILL ILL BE ARRAIGNED TODAY I Forgery and Uttering Forged Checks Charges Against Former Bank Clerk WORK IS CRUDELY DONE DONEt Well cl IC Known Po Io and nul Good nid Undoubtedly Pi p c exited VI Ills Dis Discovery co covert covery in iii II Firs t 1 In Ins ta nce Arthur AthU Brown BIown will wi be arraigned at 10 o'clock this morning before Judge e Whitaker cr of the lie ci city court l cO on charges of forgery IW Two 0 complaints charging forgery an and uttering forged or e checks wore Issued yesterday at the thc county attorneys attorney's Captain J. J B. B Burbidge Bur Bur- bl bidge ge signing them The he complaints charge that on May Ia 2 21 I 1 Brown committed forgery with In Intent intent In- In tent lent to deCru defraud the lie Utah Ulah Apex Mining company Check No 10 1632 was drawn on the tho Commercial National bank hanl and payable to 10 the order of oC Brown BIown The Time amount named was 61 Drills check which bore boro bOl lh the lie alleged forged signature of W. W C. C Olem mann manager er of the lit company compan was wa in indorsed orse b by Brown It I was wal paid b by the Commercial National Na Na- a- a bank batik The second died check hated dated May 21 21 1 was drawn rawl on ott Co bankers O being the amount named It I was wits ma made e payable to the theor or order C of or Arthur Brown and amid his name was tas signed on t the he back The signature signa signa- Isna- Isna lure fire of or F. F M. M r Orem of oC the Butler Butler- Liberal Con Consolidated Mining company compan was at lie tho bottom of oC the chec check This chock check cle was returned with the notation that the lie sl signature was not mint correct PU Forced ec t 11 mimes Cinde The forged signatures are al crude The checks which accompany the he complaints an and which will ivill wi be exhibited ex ox- in Judge Judg Whitaker's Whitakers com court t this hits morning 1 are evidence c enough that the 1 signatures ae are not genuine The he check with wih tIme the name nanie of W. W C. C Orem attached shows hows that the lie writer either cither cUhel traced the name miame or om 01 drew from COP copy The he lines Inel waver travel an and amid give unmistakable evidence that hat tho thiC hand hald was not steady when when the name was affixed to tolie the lie check The workmanship Is ver Cl crude and amid ald a a close cose scrutiny would woul have revealed the he fault Cault In in the lie signature However n Blo Browns Brown's former with wih the bank and tho thu lie known fact fact that he ho was connected with wih the company company com corn com pany ten tended e to avert suspicion the check was isas honored Tho rho second check looks look as though I It I might have havo been signed J jy by y a person The signature nature is entirely different dif di- lf- lf ferent and amid the lie worl workmanship Iw Is not a aall at atall I II all al like Ill that on the Commercial National Na Na- I tonal bank check I |