Show CASES DISMISSED ON NEW LAW POINT Statute of 1905 Operates In In I F Favor n or of Alleged Burglars Alleged Burglars I at Provo e I RU RULING ING BY JUDGE BOOTH 3 Folds That lUt Won oid I Other In Iune IJo- IJo fl l t. t I rl to Pro c Intent Steal Io 50 SU S Worth i. i Republican S Special Service Provo PO Ma May Mat 22 Judge Judge Booths Booth's Interpretation Inter Inter- n of Utah's Ulah's new law Jaw defining th the tho cri crime crIne ne f burglary in the fil first l deI de de- I g gc ge rt in the tho sal of ofU tho I U l' ag against i i Clyde Hows R J anti and William I atHon a I son l' l with w-ith um Wilds Wild's saloon llor at ot American J ln in the tho district court here hee toda today I i lw i- i point t I. I is Iii a A. ai new one Ii In court COUlt j r t. t n nd t j ll liM f 5 th tIt a t t 1 f wi i. i Hn e 11 tried ic li Had tl heo ia 1 Re r Wi W H his dt that no no tots tots- ti l br hr d ll because tim Iho tho inI in- in in- in I Wd PIl not sufficient ur int intI t io a orron offense Thi I motion notion 1 hod lh the trial pi IU I VOl 11 Fides Idos I e lal had bad rested d n and nIl nIlI I th tho courts court's instructions to the jury Jur been ieL-I d when Judge n Booth lIth 11 ocl l ln 1 11 tho t-ht a cares against the t two w. w I I 1 t ho information alleged that t Hov I tin nd II m into nto salon with to to tl q sti l 1 and wins there f i I u iHy f burg lh m un- mu I u r i which hk th Iho tho mation n wits was filed ll j. j i is HI Section 1 i. Laws of in l ads n nr s follows EV I I I II i M Vh 1 Iu u. u two the nighttime trek k I 1 nd i I enter t. or or 01 without f ores rJ n a t n i I I 1 I fl 1 do doof window or 01 i fillY any her Uret a a. or- or I iuro UIt UIt of f any hou house i 0 I ith ith intent to ci falc any I j th r felony lony i is guilty oC oC In Io 1 10 h. filo I. I I I I rile Tho cuL Jt hold tha that Ih Of t. t r j to I nid I elt ner ne- ne i r to prove an intent t. to jal i iOl nt Ol o i-o Hl n 50 50 v. fh of ot of pd to dr 01 oi rt- rt lct kl of burglary in ia tb lir fil t Legree j as HI th tho word other othi i i quile quiler r u I in th ca case e to bo ho felonious The re court on it its motion dismissed etl I the case ag against a a. and ond the in information 10 I f formation against Hows Howa as J lh th the int information In l i mation matlon is the same In both cases Judge Booths Booth's order follows I I I 1 will make this order On further further fur fur- ther b being ing advised ad to my entire Ill satisfaction satis is- is faction I find And that that- I was WM in error In admitting any auy t testimony under the the the-in- in information formation and th I ought ht to I 1 havo sustained the objection made yesterday yesterday yester yester- d day and have dl dismissed the case And that will 1 be hf the Ute order i iThe The state has bas ordered order o a. a transcript of the record and will |