Show WINS VINS STRONGER POINT Amended Complaint in Improved Improved Im Im- Irn- Irn proved Form Is Admitted in ill Court Court Tho The strong point won a a week wack ag ago as by tho the Silver King Coalition Coalton Mining company compan was given an entirely different differ ICtor- ent turn Monday when hen Judge Marshall of the this Federal Federl court admitted the amended complaint of tho the Mining company with wih so some few changes which apparently make mako the tho position clearer an and stronger than han before The he court in Its first ruling Held that the ho C company compan should mako mak clear cloar that It was In possession with lh the defendant of ot all til ni of the Conklin lode lodo claim Including the tho feet tithe LU to which was brought Into ly by I the ho Silver I King Coalition company rr that hat the company i IIi i hw that hat Caster Custer No ro 2 and Silver HIP Hi Xo q o. o 4 claims claim which overlap o the foot 3 strip trip were purchased cd by the tho deC defendant by y reason of Its Us part ownership of oC the tho hoC C Conkling In response to this ruling tho the Conkling Conk- Conk ling Jig company changed Its Is complaint to lo show v not anI only that possession expressly express express- ss- ss ly y included the tho whole of or the olain including the foot 13 strip trip hut but that hat that the defendant I by y Its Ils had hat made mate demand upon upon t the tho lt I plaintiff as tenant In common for o con- con to cover Is Its share of or the ex- ex tense Involved b by the defendant defendants s 8 p p performing per per- I ir- ir r- r forming tho the exploratory work worl wl h opened tho the ore are body bo l. l partly party within tho the foot 35 strip Claimed Share in Ii The Conkling company compan further asks ask th that hat t. t In view of ot the Sliver Silver Siver King Coall- Coall King Coalton Coal Coal- tion ton ion company compan having having purchased the overlapping claims for the purpose of or protecting its Ita It one fourth Interest In Inthe Inthe the he Conkling claim It he be decreed that the he purchase was made Jn In n trust for or orthe the he Conkling company compan to the tho extent of f Its three fourths Interest In the claim lalm and all that tho Conkling companio company compani bo be o permuted permitted to contribute Its Is share sharo of ot the he purchase price of or the Custer and anc Silver ilver Hill HJ claims In plain language the contention of o the tho 1 Conkling Mining company is that j the he Silver King King people took toole ad advantage ot of if secret information gained by them themas as 8 c owners co-owners co of ot tho the Conkling claim to fortify themselves by purchasing al- al eged conflicting ground and thus cut th heir lr partners out of all al Interest In the tho ground In which valuable ore oro bodies had iad hac been secretly opened b by tho the Silver Silve King wing company nn and that the taking of or such uch advantage Is against both the spirit and the letter leter of oC the law D By the admission of the amended complaint containing these thele contentions the he Conkling people le believe beleve that the they I have lave the thc Silver King Coalition com coin COI- COI coming and pan any pany going it I must provo prove nr first that tho the patent granted more noro r than twenty years earR ago which calls cals for or full tuB mining claims was wrong b by feet and I should that be the Conkling company has line the chance hance of establishing right to pur- pur three-fourths three Interest of the con- con claims claim which would still sun give it I the tho t claimed In tho the 1000 1000 I e or more of oC ore alleged to have havo ben been |