Show L c. c k Banker Tal es Appeal I f 1 J r t L t 5 I 41 I II I 5 i S i of 4 S L S 1 i S S. S or ort t I S f L WALSH S S t- t T t 55 1 1 COURT t. t T 2 1 ts or t th thU tt U P 1 o oC Joh j Jt J. lr pre of or tho ho l go Chien-go Xa- Xa l batik bank V f tt reb op In the flip United States Circuit Court of or Appeal A today The Tue fate oi ol r er erand I and railroad Is now noA Jn In th the the- 1 hands of ot J Judges r Humphrey anti anO I Grosscup A A decision I H 11 not C for tor several months month because je ite of ot the reAt great mass of evidence II in tho l the thc thelong thelong long briefs and annh many tobe tobo to tobo bo be reviewed by thu- thu ourt Dobyns p I I. I counsel for fol forthe for forthe the government co concluded hi his hiM mont shortly after noon And nd John S. S Miller IUler chief duet coun counsel eI for tor Mr Ir r Walsh wa wag wa given ghon 10 which to m make l la a reply Attorney D Dobyns dell delivered n a scathing arraignment of ot the tho convicted cOll banker The Thc attorneys attorney's denunciation I of pr the tIle ex banker was la In in answer to then the tho n appeal of Mr ir r. r Miller to have havo the verdict vor- vor dict t against his hilt client set se aside and particularly to the statement of or Attorney fey ney Miller that lint Mr were all legitimate and within the re regular course courso of or the lie banking banking- business S There was wn never or a case caRe whore where the system steu carried cn on was so 10 openly crimi- crimi net nal and as In tn that or R. R I i Walsh the thc lie A declared |