Show I l L NEWS Of Ul I AU AND ST STATES A IES J OGDEN NEWS JUDGE AND COURT MADE DEfENDANTS Suit Is Filed Fied in Supreme Court by Ogden District At At- At torney Republican Special Service Service Ogden Olden April 21 District I.-District District Attorney N 2 N. N J. J Harris lia has Instituted hal a proceedIng proceed proceed- In ing In the hoe Supreme court of tho the Itata state against the district court of Weber 4 count county and Judge howell Howel n ns as the tho Judge of ot that court wherein the tho district attorney claims that Ju Judge e Howell Howe erred Jn In discharging R. R E E. Bramlett It R. G G. G and John K h. Garrett Gannett and refusing to require them to Garet plead to an amended information the llin th dl district attorney e In the filed led action by against H. and acton Garr Gar Gar- r rl x tt t. t charging them with wih the tho crime of or robber robbery on un December 11 I 11 IDS 18 The Tho criminal action was one In which and Garrett Garrott Garett were wele accused of or having robbed an nn old olt man named Goff Gor at tho the saloon of oC Bramlett The Tho defendants load hall their Jar nary Joary hearing before beCore Judge Murphy Murph and were held for or trial In the tho district court court The floe district attorney afterwards after after- wards flied filed teI lots his hll Information In the dietrict district dis die court charging tho the defendants n with that crime H but from Crom the VI was WUI S 'S U eU tuo usual statemEnt state state- ment mEnt of or the time and place of ot Its com corn mission Tho The district attorney fluently tiled fed an nn amended Information charging the same offense In which Information the tho words worthe wore su supplied DpI led Recently on motion moton of Judge Magin itis ull attorney for fOl the tho defendants this this' amended Information was ns stricken from froni tho records and the defendants discharged S Tho purpose of the proceeding In tho the Supreme court Is II to compel Jud Judge e howell Howel to reinstate the tho case permit the filing of or tho amended Information the defendants to plead thereto and to proceed with wih tho the trial of or the ease rase nil all al of or which Judge Howell had Howel declined to do 10 on the tho ground that that the tho original KIa action load had been dismissed by me U district attorney an and tho the new or 1 0 amended Information could not be he le lo- lo gally med filed nor the tho defendants bo be legally compelled to plead to the same lell with with- out tut another preliminary hearing bo- bo before fore Juo Judge e Murphy Tho Tue CAse will wil be bo watched with Interest in interest In- In I terest b by the tho public I Attorneys and Pratt will wi represent Judge Howell In tho the Su Su- Su- Su premo court and Attorney W. W L. L 1 Maginnis Ma- Ma la- la ginnis win will ili appear on behalf of Brain Bram- behal ett McGuIre and Garrett The writ Issued buell h Garret by the Supreme court curt In the lie proceedings Is made returnable on May In 10 0 1303 |