Show I CITY GITY COUNCIL IN INI 1 I SQUABBLE OVER WATER I Will Determine Who Has Right to Lost Spring in Provo Canyon Provo Prove Nov No 21 I.-E. I. E. E D. D Partridge former city councilman appeared before before be be- fore foro tho the city council last lost night to support support support sup sup- port his claim to the spring of ot water In Po Poll cnn canyon on at tho mouth of Provo canyon which the city Is Js contesting Sometime ago Partridge flied nied on three quarters second foot Coot of or water from a n spring which rises and disappears disappears pears within CO GO yards and which seldom reaches the this river which Is la about half halt a a. mile awa away The Tho council claims that tho the water that sinks eventually reaches s the river and he- he cause of that fact the city has ac acquIred acquired acquired ac- ac a L prior title tithe to the stream m After Artor spending an art hour discussing tho the matter it was finally decided to make tests to determine whether or 01 not the water really reaches reache the river by an underground passage The cit city has until December 16 1 in which to file tHe tho the protest and it 1 is 16 thou thought ht that the the- rights c can n bo be determined b by that time and probably obviate ol Iteration The committee on waterworks was I Instructed to determine the advisability advisability advisability advis advis- ability of or thu tho elt city taking over tho the short waterworks system owned by John Be el which has become useless to Mr b by reason of or the tho city having constructed a line lineon lineon lineon on Fifth East street which passes his Ids home John M. M Grell Greir and Cl Clay y Spencer representing the Crier Grier House Houge and anti Olympia Olmpia cafe respectively appeared before the council last Iut night to enter entera l' l a protest t against the several wards I In Provo City behl being permitted to io con conduct bazars bazara In the heart of the cIt city without license much to the detriment detri detri- I I mont ment of the restaurant business Grant I Provo Pro Nov 0 2 Mary lor Mary A A. Mud le I I has been boon divorced from foin Joseph I ley hey whom she asserts failed tailed to provide provide pro pro- i I vide Ide for Cor her Plaintiff was given ghon the custod custody of or their S- S year 5 old ear child The parties vere iverc married at St St. George I Utah July 16 1902 I |