Show g VIEWS VIEWS' L ON TARIFF REVISION 1 SENTIMENT T IS S fOR PROTECTION Representatives Practically United On Principle of Republican Party Now York Nov o 10 The lO-The The Examiner toa today telegraphed a number of or Re ito- Republican publican members o of the next cOngress congress congress con con- the favored gress asking whether they prompt tail tariff IT revisIon und end If It FO so o along what lines J The following replies were received up to midnight m Charles 11 II H. Morrison Missouri Missouri- n. n lurl- lurl There here should he be a revision of or tariff lJ by the next tiet congress sq but along the lines of full protection to o our r labor and our Industries At Articles tides like zinc ores not row now on the dutiable list should have O a tariff to simply protect quI ur mines against cheap labor of or MexIco Mexico Mex Mex- ico ice and other othel foreign countries s. s A A. a The verdict o of or the tho country Is Ig that the shall be protective and congress should make it such C. C n 11 II Sperry I Connecticut I am In or favor of of a revision on conservative aUve and anti protective lines I do not mean meana a n general reduction but a modification tion where conditions have changed from when whon the Dingle Dingley bill was pa passed ed AV Man tin South I Dakota The Tho tariff should be revised at a special special spa spa- cial f sIOn The Tho principle of or protecting protect protect- lug lag American products to the extent or difference in cost of or production should be bo observed and liberal pro- pro us I z f. f H J lar a i CONGRESSMEN'S VIEWS ON TARIFF REVISION I d from las Our Iii to the the- the American laborer should be he Included Charles S. S Scott Kauris COngress I-C I n ought to revise the tite tariff at nt the extra se session lon all alo along alona the line but bul on protectIon pro pro- protection lines I Hoh It I 1 P. P Colorado Th Tho Tho o H parly I stands r pledged Jle h to t t revise retis tho the tarl tariff along ulong protective lines j I congress Albert W. W I. I Io T IO f 1 believe bellevo o belc should prompt promptly undertake a 3 revision of the tariff so o a as to correct t tan an any In inequalities or 01 excessive rates rutes which mR may have 1 resulted from front changed conditions in iii 11 commerce and trade in the past 1 12 years cals This hl ls rovis- rovis ion bit should be bc ba based baaed cl on tho the principle of protection to American In Industry and so 50 as to tj insure th the the maintenance or th th-j American scale cac of or WH wages es The Tho time has como corno lot for the United States Slates to adopt ma maximum and minimum rates Frank W. W V. V Wyoming Thc The Republican party must keep leep its it pled pledges with wih regard to the lw tall andaU and all aU other matters and revision should platform be along the lines 1 laid ld down own in iii il the the- Johll 1 tl J I lv IC-cu IC cli ch j II ln L Am Ant strongly In favor of or revision luli ulon along Jill lines hues i of or Republican tariff reform Tendency should be downward lint hut n nIto no Ito Instance below point of proper protection protection pro pro- to tv American Indu Industry try and amid la Ia- Ia a- a bee bor J Harry M i Ii Missouri t Hurl I I stand I on th the thu Republican platform In reference to tn tariff I revis revis- ion olin A. A Sterling Illinois Congress si should revise t tariff In extra sc session loli t. t te o be bc called Immediately utter after March 4 1 4 blaring bearing in Iii mind tho the protective o principles principles ples pies all the time Phillip ii Campbell Ci l ia Kauris l I I should like c to see sec ec the ti-me work voiK of revising th the th-i tariff taken up and n completed at nt the time earliest p possible moment The Tho revision revis revis- ion 1011 should maintain the strict po policy II c of protection n and should pi not deprive an any American citizen of 01 a K single lIa days day's sin cm employment GerC A. A I lur limit I favor revision 1 revision of If tariff on 1111 line liumes of or tariff plank In Republican national platform always maintaining such scheduled articles that Into competition with foreign production as will trill cover Cl the dIfference In wages of or workingmen working working- men cn engaged aged In lit producing such uch anti anti- cJ s in foreign countries 8 mid and this coun coun- tr try I J distinctly and amid specially favor or u a a protection duty ut on un bituminous con coal I lumber an arid and glassware and amid kind rod 11 products pro pro- ducts duets trout from American labor I U. U C C. C Kentucky The Six Six- ty first congress should revise and re ro- ro adjust tho the tariff alon along protective lines hues such as os heretofore adhered to lo by tho the Republican part party part I u. u r. l 1 I am ant In favor or of or the tariff revision 1 al along along- ng the lines Indicated in iii lIl the Republican plat plat- form I would put lumber pulpwood an and print 1 paper In III th thuC free I list hit I mini u. u F. F i- i r. r t 1 l Tavor ol re revision re- re vision of the tariff upon the lie lines blues setout set sel out In the Republican platform II IIan an c tn e Cur i Con Con Congress gross gress should revise re the time tariff at the tho earliest opportunity and a ascertain what schedules ules arc alc higher than necessary a iJ difference between the cost of Plo production at ot homo home ml abroad Gi G Warrem J. J Ohio I Ohio I favor Cavor revision of or the tariff on pro 1 I lines so 50 as to preserve c and anti t I fo foster I er American in enica n I Industry nd us I including ltd U d I a g I agriculture apul to secure the employ employ- of oC our people ut mit good food wages Generally Generall lumber and perhaps 8 some other oIlier things of oC like character now protected pro pro- tecte i should be put on the free list but wool and ancl generally other protected protect d I things thinS's miscalled raw material should i remain reasonably protected tant new or Infant industries 1 should likewise be protected Tariff ules should bo be adjusted by reduction or other otherwise leo MO so as to make tho the general policy of or protection more equitable I and to prevent ent injustice in competition but nothing nothing- should be done to destroy lestroy j general prosperity I Duncan F I P. The Tho tariff should l be revised n I t. t along protective protective pro- pro lines with wiLls the thus maximum and and ancl minimum provision pro incorporated tf K U nr l I I I I I ii I I I Iam am ant certainly In favor or of revising the tariff and to me rae that means ans revising It downward not upward The Tue lie lie- Ho 1 I publican party went on at thelt tho the thol l lost t t election a au as expressing Itself for fora I a 1 revision re and tho the people in IlL general general- those who wise voted for or that t revision understood it il to be lie a 1 reduction therefore therefore there there- I fore I am ama In favor ol a of or ut a i revision It down wards I 1 favor u n protection cllon of or I c Western West Vest tern t- t ern ens As Aim to whether this r revision sit re- vision comes at u a special session Im Immediately his his- nl mediately after Tafts Taft's Inauguration or I in III Hie regular lar session now approach I ing uig 1 t do not nut care I 1 want It to como come up p at once and I think the people of oC tho ho country want It done at al once what what- er cr T there t Is it to ibo do r nuI tier Amr t 1 For ti-For For OI our lout years V In congress In season and Hut at Ut ut of season reason I have Vo worked for tor tariff r. r r. Ision I was In favor or of ot a revision rO i h Iy the lie last congress as well vell as us by the con congress ress The tariff should U tie revised rc along tho the line lino of ot Republican can an protection of our In Industries and amid the lie American There ar are schedules higher than titan necessary to accomplish accomplish ac ac- ac- ac this huts end and they should be re reduced It If they arc too low to afford adequate protection they should be bo raised i A. A n Illinois I 1 I fa- fa for tor a strict compliance with the plank in ie the tho Republican platform relating to tariff revision rc Ihs rhe tariff should shoal be lIc revised strictly along ulong tariff lines an and not lo iu accordance with the time tree free tr trade d s of or the Democratic party PortY Personally I 1 am more than hats ever convinced con that a protective tariff is essential to 0 a continuance tco of or prosperity in this country V. v. v Audrey I mum OhIo OhIo-I I favor re revising ro- ro the tariff along protection lines J. J I Hampton lour Prim 1 lii- lii Where It is clearly demonstrated that existing tariff opera operates tes against the American producer there should bo boa a revision But Dut most of or m my constituents constituents constituents hold that or no revision Is ne necessary except to further protect ct tue products of American labor against un- un fair foreign competition A. A Ll JIt I n oln II-I II IIII I II I believe bellevo the tho whole tariff schedule should b bi bf taken up all und and be revised ro to meet tIme tile I peoples people's present day needs Vo We c o ha out outgrown rown Lh the old schedule ul I believe In th the pt e c system expressed in iii tho the difference measured d by the reasonable reason reason- uble able cost of or production at nt homo home and the thc cost of production abroad as ns forming formIn form form- In ing a Ll fair basis bash for Cor revenue L I am opposed to the lie government conI con- con I the questions of or profits In Iho thu thoI I j measure That l Is nn an an affair of oC comI com coin fierce merce I am for or u IL measure based on pure Jure economical consideration to meet I tins the n necessity co of ot producing W. W It U. I IIII Thc ThO The tariff I should bo lIo revised ro without favor o in to Loun un any special Interest and amid along such lines a at as trill least disturb the tao l legitimate bl business of the tie country and the cant caru- inge of ot our wage wase workers W. W Summit hi it t I favor favorI or I 1 I revision m lon of or the the- tariff along protective I lines I I n I 1 I have havo ullI ull- ull I solute nothing to fIa say along the Uner lines Une Indicated by the question r Io c li V. V Gruff Illinois I agree agree- with Mr r. Taft Tafts views upon the tariff and the revision lon thereof I prefer pre ILO e fur fer not to go 0 Into huito the thc subject of ot how howit it shall bo be done llone I prefer to wait until m my arrival In ill a L few days s 's when I 1 ex expect x ox poet to tu submit my views to Chairman of or the ways was and means com coin lit I t tee William I I If Coulomb Coulomb- Tho The people of or my district bellove in It stand aland pat policy on the tho tariff and onil believe ii In proper protection to all In InI Industries industries In- In I s o of all portions of our nation ji A. A J J. 6 ml un Con Coui k Con Congress gross gress should sho revise the tariff remove c I th the duties not hot needed for foi protection or revenue an and reducing thosS that aro are found lo to be he unduly high Coal Iron an and petroleum should be tie I on the tho free free- list The rite only dut duty al allowed allowed ci- ci lowed on lum lumber ll should l be bo counteracting counteract counteract- ing duty to tv offset the time Canadian export I dut duty on logs I I tUCh l' l l i I till nn heartily and positively In bus favor ol of a ti I revision rc of the Ii's tariff along pro progressive Republican publican lines and anil especially am ant I Ifor cc for fOI fr r- r lumber Chries I II I c. c S. S n I favor or a a u r revision of th the tariff in connection conne conne- thou tion wit with h t tho h l Republican 11 national platform platform plat plat- t- t form furm of HuOS 1905 1 Ohio Ohio Ohio- I favor favora a revision o of the tariff along protective c I lines I n cs I 2 C. A. A tre A Congress Congress u should Immediately ly arL- arL March larch 4 to 10 r revise tho ho tariff The TIme principle of ut protection lo tu American la laboring In- In Il- Il boring men meil must mul not be forgotten I leave lea out the idea of or reasonable profit to the thc lie manufacturer I believe bellevo in tariff revision re and ancl not nut in revolution Let the time best bet Interests of the country understand that the Iso K great i at principle of r protection t will not be Eb cJ d r i abandoned d Certain or r dries cl should be lie cut out and many liko 1110 kerosene should bo lie o put ut on oa lh the Lime free list Them Them-q are aro a few like pottery potter which h should be given a hl higher rate of 0 protection The workers In the paper mills should alt albo o be he protected This particular in industry in- in clu Lr should not be bc marked or bred terell L Let t us UM have O reasonable revision re a le leveling Ie up of or one OttO quality an and lt 1st I t us the operation quickly in order onion that thaI tho the slight wound mn may quickly quick quick- ly Jy heal 1 I I or Slit 1111 ilu in I J think congress conr shou should revise lc the tariff and I favor revision lo according to the th- Republican national platform b by a adjusting the present schedules ules so o as to leave lea the thc protective duL duty duly equal to time the difference in the cost of or production pro iwo here un and abroad I The Tho Investigations now lion going on Under uner un un- der er the authority of or th the house committee commit commit- tee on ways and amid mans and ancl the thc satiate tO committee on finance should bo lie able ablo to determine what this difference is upon all commodities on th time the dutiable list and then the tho work of ot adjusting the time tariff talICe under this rule should begin Such revision Is ts what the tho country countr ex expects cx- cx and the time result of ot time the ii shows that such a 0 revision rc Is ls de dc- de- de manu cc tin Mill II Illinois Of or course courso congress conre I revise 18 the tariff I think It will without any un- un ary delay and along tho time lines laid down n In time the Republican platform I urn ama In favor of n a revision re of the tIme tariff in accordance li with tho limo declaration of or princIples made maul In the national Republican convention held heM In C Chicago ii I cago o. o I I J 1 ilium-f ilium Midi I think there should be a thorough r re revision is i's I vision Islon of the time tariff That's a na ad much na as I will trill Na say now no 11 I II I un humid I Ohio I Iii Im I'm for free rree lumber I and tariff revision rc first last u and Jul alwayS p pH ll H rl Vr York TIle rime tariff question Is II too big a a subject sub lull jeet to be lie discussed off otC Congress Con Con- gress ss will devote ote month to It tt when whets the flue lu subject conies comes UD tin and hod I dont don't see aeo that th there rc IH is anything to be accomplished accomplished b by discussing it now how ctr C U. 10 io Illinois The tariff should be bl revised How How- ov over r the time revision should be hc carefully 1 done I believe c the time tariff should b be C revised in such s a a. way that the duties S on imports would be sufficient t to pIt protect pro puo t ct t iii h wages trages of ar American workingmen working working- men that men that I i. i to put a tariff on good a which would ju just jUHt t balance the time differ difference ence between tho the cost of ot manufacture C In this country countr and ami in III foreign countries countries coun coun- tries |