Show KEARNS REBUKED COURT COURT J TRUST MAGNATES SUPPORTING BRYAN ARYAN SAYS ROOSEVELT I J PRESIDENT 4 GIVES OUT THE SHE FACTS Open Letter better to Senator Knox Replies to Gompers's Gomp- Gomp Compers's Compo Gompers's o erss ers's Appeal for Vote I THAT INJUNCTION PLANK Democrats Favor Measure Which Capitalists Believe to Be Unconstitutional I- I F. F A RECORD OF REM REMEDIES EDI ES t It Chief Chief Executive Exe Lays Bare Fallacy F Fallacy Fal Fal- al- al lacy of Bryans Bryan's Position on Courts i I have acc accomplished i 1 so something something- ething I hope to accomplish J t push something more before I leave office and I have taken sp special ci and p w 4 ti l Ir t 1 j 7 acy Y b ca I be ver leis els I r he 1 male i nb bet beat itt tt d for or r con 1 c continuing con con- 1 I the work of securing for the workers workers' of the country country country coun coun- try their rights I eel will vill do everything in my power for the workers except to do what is wrong I will do wrong for no man President Roosevelt Washington n hl ton on Oct Vt 1 f 21 I happen I to tu know that shut certain great grent tru trust t t mn flung Hotes hun huge hl In ht the In t weeks ks In nii Hr to to tn ruts hy they thc nero cro secretly supporting Mr Mi r. r Bryans Bryan's election that tilt tho laws larva Mr fir r. r nOun proposed Injunction anti law lu g c the tho the thc Ix o lx lit 1 would woul them tu courts would H II throw turo enact cutlet tho the to tutu ami that lint out tali could be uc thou them declaration President ent with this With Ith Roosevelt today todar a again ln entered the lists list open latter leHer to United Enclosing an open Stator Senator I P. P K Knox of oC Penn Penn- In part the thc President says sas sylvania of or October 13 dally papers The Tho Sameel Samuel Sam Sam- Mr an open letter from t contain Amen Ameri American i of the president L uel eel Gompers to of Labor appealing Ung Federation can cnn to vote ote for tor Mr Bryan workingmen asserts that letter laUer In hi his S II lr Gompers country countr Is destroying de- de this of or the Judiciary democratic government eminent o and andl substituting and corrupt o l Substituting In the Interests of or corp corporate despotism makes clear and h he a further power which ho believes hy h- h y that t the means the tho place r has haH s set t up In iii this despotism o ot f proceeds Is IR b by the k I or of Injunction democracy In the court of or equity Gompers t Word of J Labors Labor's His words word are Democratic went to the h t en labors labor's con con- party made mado arty y That cant candidates can can- par It Its t n Its own to those remo- remo s 's for ever office already submitted submitted sub sub- tiles tiles' labor I has son son- last The Tho e ress to con th very cry tepee In this quotation remedies to del the tho specific unde Mr which tIr 11 Gompers pledged itself s Party part had makes clear tin now His statement the platform plat plat- Important plank In hi It which hi h ns t f form tonn number ot of earne earnest n a vast ost puzzling to Lo Continued on ra o Nine PRESIDENT GIVES OUT THE FACTS From Page Pe Pale On One thinking People That plank reads nfl 08 4 I Questions ot of judicial have arisen practice especially iii fn Connection with th Industrial dJ Wo We that the parties to all partes Judicial 01 proceeding proceedings pro pro- should be 10 treated with rigid Impartiality and that n y should not be bo Issued in S Injunctions an any case where would not Issue If It no I Industrial In In- dispute wore were involved Cleans Nothing This Is Pi Ii the tho plank that promise the remedy against Injunction Injunction- which Mr Ir a askel ked of I kel Mr Ir Bryans Bryan's party part Jo In actual faCt It U absolutely I nothing no In the law could coul be bo upon It I. I no u man without with with- wih- wih out put inside connections could coul tell tel what Us It meaning would turn out to be as the plank apparently leaves each judge judeo freo to an say eay when ho Issues an injunction In a labor case whether or not not it in ii II a n case CDe where an injunction would Issue were not labor Involved But this plank la is apparently r p t ct clear to Mr r. r Gompers and In liI his letter leter to his followers he Indicate question just what he understands under under- stands sands It II 1 to means meal He lie le aR crt that ho he has the ha requisite inside knowledge His statement that Mr Dran Bryans Bryan's party parly for tor it H was waR Mr Ir Bryan Dryan who dictated the the platform pled pledged ed to those thoRe remedies which labor had hud already submitted to congress is Ic a n perfectly clear olear and definite defnie statement I Matters of or Record The remedies which Mr Ir Compere Gomper has hn already alread submitted to con congress confess are aro matters mater of oC record and the tho Identification tion of or his remedy against ton tiona tons In labor disputes Is easy and certain This remedy In is In tn house bill bi No 54 fa o of the te first session sea ses sion lon of the Sixtieth congress congre the context context context con con- text of oC which Is appended d Tho The gist of ot the tho bill bi Is this First after forbidding any federal Judge to issue a n restraining order for COl foran or oran an Rn injunction in any labor dispute ex- ex cp t to prevent r rent ent Irreparable Injury to property or property right It cal provides ro that no right j to lo carry carryon on business of or any particular kind of ot at nn any particular place If at nt atall atall all al shall be construed held considered considered consid consid- ered cred Or Oi r treated as property or as con- con a property right t j Second it f provides that nothing agreed upon or done b by or moro more parties In connection In-connection with wih a labor dispute shall constitute a conspiracy I or other criminal or offense or be prosecuted prosecuted pros pros- as such unless tho the thing agreed upon or done would be he harmful harmful harmful harm harm- ful It If done dono h by a single le Individual Tho Only Tho bill bil here hero described Is not the remedy that 1 Mr Gompers ha already alread submitted to congress but butI it I Is the one and only remedy which ho and those associated with him bun In his lila present movement have hae announced that the they will wm accept In the matter mater against the courts on the Injunction Issue Tho The counsel for the American Federation Federation Fed Fed- of ot Labor and Mr Gompers it appears appear aro both on record to this effect effect Could courts exercise an any moro more brutal or unfeeling despotic power than Mr Ir Gompers claims for or himself him him- self relf and hi his followers In this legislation legislation legisla legisla- tion ton which would woul permit them without wih- wih with out hindrance of ot any kind to car carry carryout carryout out In fn every over form torm and degree or the secondary boycott bocott i Does Docs Dots Mr Dr Bryan an agree with Mr Gompers that all al existing legal ro- ro 10 on the enforcement of ot every degree of oC the tho boycott should be bo that the tho Industrial cx- cx communication of the tho Innocent mer mer-i Chant who refuse to render l' l k Honed obedIence to the orders order ordel o of Mr r. I r- r p should be e legalized and en encouraged CH- CH or does lacs ho he believe with us and With r. otner q r who differ wits Mr In iii dier r. r Gompers this matter form torm of oC boycott I morally ti wrong Tuft Tuf I r It Definite Defnie Mr Ir Taft i Is 8 this point Perfectly definite on does docs CS Mr Ir Br The Tho Bryan stand land citizen M who votes for tor or again against Mr Taft Tnt on this does so o with his a clear wih eyes open and ud with Ith himself lt ot of from Mr tr Taft his position Ho He has frankly discussed his this subject time and again agin both In with wih VM this thle th moh VS s. s hiJ campaign and prior to hh Ms his nomination nn i tt HO Hc has hns been willing to to express lii his position clearly and lo to assure workingmen that to protect them In n their rights ho he willing ther Is willing to go to u th the limits Hilts of ot what he considers on justice but Ills S that ho will wi not go o furth r definition n of ot justice to labor does dOf the ine nn not rf ns as we know it I. I Include either elthor cf t principles contained In Mr Ir Oom- Oom pers' pers am a M a set forth In ln bill V D n eg Mr 1 Bryan Brjan agree with wih 1 Mr Taft on n these thEse w tilI J h h. h state stat Publicly definitely whether ho accept tho the accept program oui- oui ii lila his lined A In this Ulis bill bi ns as Mr Mr- Gompers In letters has a he does leters the tho public that tat Attacks Atuck on Cour Courts Ir Id Mr Bryans Bryan's platform paid R a A tribute to our courts of ot Justice Mr Ir Gompers Gomper now Mr Ir Bryans Bryan's Drans open and avowed aVowed nil al ally has In letters leters attacked the tho federal cour courts in unmeasured terms of ot reproach because b by a long line of ot decisions the tho equity courts court have refused to mako make an nn outlaw of or the business man because his right to carry cart on a lawful business under tho peaceful law has ha been protected by the process o of Injunction because in ina a 1 word one of ot tho the most vital and mot most j I fundamental right of ot tl-e tl the business world the right of a n business man to car carry on his business has been een sus sus- tamed and not denied by the processes of the courts court of ot equity This sweeping attack of ot Mr Gompers upon sweeping tho the Judiciary has been made In a frank and open effort efort to secure votes for Mr I Bryan Are these attacks made with wih Mr Bryans Bryan's consent Do the they meet with wih his approval QI Does ho he Indorse them or does ho repudiate them 1 I 1 feel that that I have the tho right to speak frankly in this matter maler because throughout m my term as President it has been my constant object to do everything in my power both by administrative ad ad- action and by endeavor endeavor- r In lag ing to secure legislative action to advance the cause muse of labor protect it from front unjust ng aggression and secure to It Its It legitimate rights right Inter t In iii Tuft Tuf TufI I have accomplished something I hOle to li j r more murO bolero before I leave office and ami I hn lm e 0 taken 11 special and peculiar Interest In Mr Ir Tafts Taft's because e I believe he lie J Is the nina mail Ic hot t nUNI f fur r the lie therl rl work tork of or beI for th the lie workers j r of the lie country their rights I will wi do everything In my mr power for or the workers except to do what Is wrong wronG I 1 will wJ do wrong for no man unan I 1 have not the slightest doubt that such a Q law Jaw as that proposed by Mr Bryan Bran would If Jf enacted b by congress be declared constitutional by a unanimous Supreme court unless court court unless Indeed Mr Bryan DIan were able to pack this court with men appointed for or the special purpose of declaring such a law Jaw con con- u tona I 1 happen to know that certain trust magnates have announced within the tho past few weeks In answer to the question as l to wh why the they were openly or secretly favoring ta the tho election electon of or Mr Bryan Bran that tho the laws Mr lIr Bryan DOn proposed Including especially this law Jaw wo would ld be hol wholly Ineffective be because because because be- be cause the court would undoubtedly throw them out Olt and that tho the promises to enact them could therefore bo be safely |