Show SI ff t C. C tr 1 V T r Judgment m ll-m en t was was' n 1 1 1 I In ih U court atur- atur r Chi lay In n favor froe ot of U the Union Pacific flail nall- t- t wn way company In u f fUKe eam UKe which luis lU boon been r pending for tor six Ix year years yeara nud nn whiCh haw hate I i been heen tried three times Urno 8 The unit Hult was waR originally brought J by Daniel Densley Densle I i l' l Jr for dama damages eg for non-de- non livery of eatS cais In which sheep w were ro 1 I f to too tob lio shipped and for not handling the tho with cave care and dispatch dispatch dis dis- nt proper 7 patch after the cars were obtained O There te was a disagreement of tile the jury Jur at tho the first trial and at nt tho the second I 4 t. t Densley got a verdict oC or 1500 When r. r th tho company appealed and a new ne trial 1 I was vas granted the case was brought be be- 1 fr Judge forejudge Ritchie without a a. jury I |