Show i COLORADO WINS VIN g PRIZE fROM UT AU I t Visiting Debating Team Shows S. S i I Federal Control Should J Not Be Extended ended 7 I NOT UNANIMOUS JUDGES JUDGE I 1 Old Question Long Discussed I S Settled Once Again By S Young Statesmen J S b k By a vote of two to on one the do- do balers baters of the University of or Colorado I t. t defeated those of the University of S Utah in n their annual debate at the Salt Lal Lale e theater Tuesday evening The t fLaUe debate was one of the most Interesting i over o heard In Salt Lake and while the theA A audience was only It Jt was I 1 t sufficient to show that interest in fn coilS coil cou- tests which call can for brain power are S becoming as popular In Salt Lake as ns of oC brawn ft I I 5 I- I Judge King was chairman of ot the S. S debate The Tho University Glee club COIS COI'S con con- S S listing of or 24 2 members made Its Initial initialS initial'S S 'S W It appearance singing selections at the tho beginning and at the end of or the doA do- do A I a The Tho question discussed was as Resolved That the present distribution IS t tion of or power between the tho federal and f state tato governments ii is not adapted to tor L t- t r S modern conditions nn and calls for tor a ref rei ree re- re along tho the lines of further furtherS i f e adjustment S it L centralization Utah had the tho affirmative o and CobS Colorado Colorado Colo Cob S rado the negative Each spool speaker er was S 5 given 12 minutes to tall talk and five nun nun- utes ues for lor rebuttal I. I S C C. Henry Anderson opened for Cor Utah stating the four fout points under contention conten- conten e f lion Hon which tho the o side would attempt to prove He lIe said In part 5 S i S Utah CD C Ever since tho the forming of the constitution con con- j of or the United States there r. r has been the need of giving to the r government the power to act If It ItI p. p In regard to national questions I J this power has been In fn the constitution l Mon tion It has hns never been exercised until r-c r 4 recently We Wo Intend to prove that ur r First present conditions demand It It second present evils c cannot bo ho corrected correct correct- ed without it Jt third present nt nse-nt evils lIs are a n S Sc i result of ot this lack of or power and fourth jJ L these causes can cnn only be bc eradicated by byJ byJ J- J giving sl the power to central authority A J When the thc national banks were first i attempted it was wa's held that thit they were ero J SJ unconstitutional but the they were formed vetoed the bill for the improvement im mu- t 5 t Madison Y f 4 provement of the waterways but t X since that time the waterways have ha havet I t t J been een Improved k fj Three cX examples ot of where v er tills this I power I I I Is Js most needed today is in 10 toe national I I S. S control of or child labor the tho national 4 i j m control of or the divorce laws and tho f 9 control of or tho the monopolies i PV F. D. D Anderson was the first toS to represent present Colorado Mr r Anderson Andorson took S up Sup P the entire time Ume for his speech In Inthe the tho development of tho the child labor question He said In part S What StateN Mate Arc Are By the diverting or of t the tho o power now i Invested in tho the states state to a national one one the reform t that has been Started all the state In tho Union e c eu a. a la in r regard to child labor I would be lost and the only final remedy remedy rem rem- 1 S edy would be a 0 constitutional amen amend amend- fj I merit ment j James Carlson for the affirmative e showed that congress had been given d t the power to deal w th Interstate cornS cornis corn corn- S f is merco merce and that until congress had 4 a tal taken en this power there were ten tenfold Cold 1 as as' as many railroad regulation laws as aB 1 fl 11 there were states He lie showed under 5 tho the present state control It was Irn- Irn i K possible to govern monopolies which l' l I 7 p J B could be Incorporated in one state 5 I 5 and do bu business bulnes s in another f t M P. P S. S was the next speaker ft v B for the negative Ho lie pointed out how r t c congress had always had the tho power to a tu I act In regard to Interstate affairs but buty y had had been been too neglectful to attend to toi i S 'S her ber P. P Dl Divorce Laws LO v Ln r m On ef I j n. n W. W Young Jr champion of the Utah team proved himself to be the champion ot of the the- debate Without al aid aidS S 4 of or notes noles or documents he t gave saye a clear 1 S Interpretation of the present divorce i t laws in the United States He held that by a uniform law of divorce tho the present state of would roud b bo be re reduced re irL to the minimum S A. A E. E Nafe champion of or the Colorado 5 team stated it would be utterly ImpossIble Impossible sible for tor the national government to tot handle handlo the uniform divorce law or child childr t r it r labor 1 law lav a that by a centralization a machine of corrupt ann TI arul 1 Immoral de devices doa do- do vices would quickly follow In Its a S- S wake 1 The Tho rebuttal speeches of all tho the men were ere greatly superior to their first ef efforts of- of forts Tho The judges for tor the tho debate were Senator Senator Sen Sen- j ator ator Steph Stephen n Love Lo-e Ju Judge c Geor George e G. G S Armstrong and Professor Professor- D. D It IL Chris Chris- S. S tenser The Tho timer for Utah was W. W S. S S L nn an for Colorado IL JL E. E Moore |