Show NO INTERFERENCE IN CHICAGO TRACTION Supreme Court Declines to Act and the Property Will viII WillBe WillBe Be Sold Washington Jan 23 The rhe The United stales States Supreme court today declined to In Interfere in Jn the Chicago o street railway wa tangle angle and counsel for tor the tho Chicago Railway company declared d tonight before boore bo- bo fore ore leaving for tor Chicago o that tho the property property prop- prop 1 erty of or the Chicago Railway company would be sold suld at auction on Saturday c next under the decision of Judge Grossup Gross- Gross I cup up Also that the company would be beIn bein c cIn in a position to comply with all aU the tue terms enns d In tho the sp special ordinance passed by the tho common council of or Chicago Chicago Chi Chi- cago 0 In February 1607 1007 Chief t Shortly after 2 o o'clock today Justice Fuller announced that the J court woul not grant g-fant the application of or Henry Crawford and Charles II H. Aldrich Aldrich Al- Al AlI I counsel to five ti registered stock stock- holds of or the West Chicago Street Railway Rail flail I wa way company for tor an appeal and a a. writ of supers Chief Justice Fuller said that the tho court re refused used the tho application because there was no apparent reason to for tho the Interference by the Supreme court In I Iother Iother other words ho held that no federal question Involving a n. violation of ot the constitution had hind been raised I We Ye will now be able to assume control control control con con- of or our property said ono one of or the counsel for tho the Chicago Railways company com corn pany The right of or operation and control of ot our lines was seriously l Involved in involved tn- tn as all of or our franchises In the north and west division of or the city cHy would lave gone to tho the Chicago ngo City o company rival corporation n 1 h had wo we be been n unable to proceed Un- Un th t rm nano oi tho nv- nv tal ala s 1 c o ma u l tM I possession of or franchise rights now controlled d by our lines Jines had bad we been unable to assume charge of them by February 1 1 It does not seem possible that any other question can be bo raised to stop us now that the Supreme court has declined to interfere The Supreme court ma mado o no reference to the sensational charges mado made against Judge Grosscup by Al- Al ane and Crawford In their application for the appeal |