Show I I I PEANUTS PEABODYS I STORY FILED WITH COURT GOURT Deposition in Utah Fuel Case Proves of Great Advantage Advantage Advantage tage to Prosecution ACCOMMODATED BROTHER New Yorker Received 1 1000 From Froni Company for Action in ill Deal In accordance with the stipulation sign sign- cd by tho the attorneys 8 representing the guy gov o eminent and the Utah tanh Fuel lIlI company the tho deposition of oC Ho Koyal al C. C Peabody filed with time the clerk of siC the federal court yes yes- es ar Time The lIeo deposition III was fiS taken In New Kew NewYork NewYork York 1011 City last month anti and will be bo an important im of oC the evidence to bi be l' l In Introduced Introduced In- In III In the thit trial o of the coal fraud trawl case ease o against t 11 tim OKI fuel C C. Pea H is tin this fron Koyal Hoal body person ler on rom who whom III the company claims It acquired tub title to lo till coal land In Carbon albon county for tor which I th they hey paid him a as a consideration thou tion 1 acquired 1 his title titis' through h deeds e ol from rom rein time the am aol for Cor which the tiis' company se set up UI that t he lie pats paid various sums sum of Ut mone money Tho prosecution looked hooked fur for no 10 little trouble trou trou- tile ble III in disproving ln the cue defendants defendant's claims that It was a Ll purchaser In goo good faith from Crom rein Peabody for Co Coa em- em a a. r ll large e consideration hind hall It Its claims been verified by 1 Pea Pea- body Tho The attorneys fur for the were however most a agreeably surprised at tt the thet t testimony of nr Peabody which was to the thc effect ct that h ho lie knew nothing of tho the trans except that II he lie received the deeds from time the and again transferred his bis Interest to till the toh Fuel company II n us as an aim accommodation to his hi broth I or el er eorge e Foster who was In Interested n- n t In the company l n-I n I Nothing ot ur it if izi staL In response to Limo tho question 03 as to the time request ma made e h by George F. F Peabody tilts the witness sold said In time the deposition I J 1 was urns requested b by m my brother who was urns at nt the time l on on ot or the principal of or the 1111 Rio Uli Grande Western l cum corn I J pany an He lie a as asked ked kell me I If I would take tolt to soak soak- property that the con construction company was aM purchasing I or ha hind had purchased pur chased and hol hold time the title until thc they hail had arrived n 1 some Inline plan by lW which th would woul transfer tn It to sonic some company lie He further testified I never lever rea read nn any of the deeds deed that transferred d the t ty to nit nn- 1 knew kue nothing about th time the deal Th Thu TIll dee deed to the Utah t Fuel ruel wa was written when presented to tu mo me and 1 I sl sinned nell It v In lit rc regard arll to the Ule Con l Mr 11 Pea Pen Peabody Peabody bod body said After matter wa closed up lp i I r was presented with one bond for You did dill not ot know that It contained an any consideration lion tion was asked No u I didn't know about the contents of oC It I read na read It It t Did you Oll not understand n that tins this property was urns In l Utah No o I had no Idea where It urns 11 It might ht have been In Mexico Mr leabo Peabody replied lesi At the thc conclusion n. n the witness s 's saul said that t thc he lie had bad acted simply to tn hit his brother und nod knew nothing about the thc matter llo said laid he lie was not MUI sure that time the deed eed hind had IJ been to tile the Utah l Fuel com eom pany |