Show ATTEMPT TO SHAKE I EXPERTS EXPERT'S EXPERTS TEST TESTIMONY i I Utah Fuel Company Keeps Professor Taft Taff on Stand StandI Stand Stand- I Witnesses Summoned TilL The hearing in itt II I the thc tic ClaIm Fud Fuci company com coin COI- COI puny pany case Caso was WU p continued d before S. S II I. I I Lewis mu master In chancery Wednesday tl The entire day n was occupied d in the cross ClOHS examination of or Professor Taft Taff time the government O export expert geologist the aim ol or of Lii defense being to break up his testimony tea tes In regard to time the character of oC the time land lant taken up imp b by the time company Professor Taft Taff I Is to be r re retained re- re tamed on omm tho time stan stand tor for the remainder of ot the tIme The officers of t time the h United States marshals marshal's mat mar m are arc In southern Utah serving ing InS processes I s for witnesses to LO appear at the hearing hearing both for Cor the government nt and for tho the defense It I Is estimated that upward of ur OO witnesses will wi be called before boron tin time examiner In thu tho coa coal cases eases to t bc be heard b before rolo him hini I. I X v. Ij i. I. I In hi tl stilt Milt ul Ju Just Jun t for fur J U I l jS Claiming the rental value of their property was worth OO a mouth ani anti and that hint time thc services of couns coun counsel l to defend defenda a certain suit Instituted by the tenants ten ten- ants was worth OO Louis Lotus LuIs Beretes Oll er Berets Albert Ibert Mayers fayers and anti Nellie Nel Nd- el- el hI lie lt R. R Mayers filed a suit Hult Wednesday against time the I I. X N. L. L L Furniture nn and Carpet Carpet Carpet Car Car- pet In Installment house for In Interest In- In terest an and costs Judgment for tor 1000 Is also asked against 1 I A. A am and W. W I L. L Crawford who were re sureties on 01 th the lon bond for rOl costs In the time suit filed b by bythe the company compan The Ihme plaintiffs arc the owners of ut th tIme the store at 38 South State street and th the I. I X If I. J. J company leased tho time room Th Time The lease expired No Nov 30 1900 and after that time It is claimed refused to va va- va cate In order to 10 regain possession th time the owners commenced a suit In the city court The furniture company broughan brought brough an au action in the Limo District court coun an and se secured secured se- se cured a r restraining or order r preventing the time owners from prosecuting tIme the stilt gull But By By reason of ut th time the restraining order orter th the owners were deprived of or time tho property from Dec J. J to May Ia I 1 1907 Th The claim the owners property was worth at a n rental figure of 00 tm and figure th the tho bill bl at mit i The suit was finally de determined tie tie- e. e In i he time Supreme court tn und rind th tIme value of or counsel in defending the tue sul uit ul s Is The rime attorneys for the tho plaintiffs plaintiffs plain plain- tiffs are J. J J M. M J. J Thomas and anti W. W R R. Hutch Hutch- 1 inson ii son |