Show taxes h OR al 4 suit started in utah I 1 brings more important litigation Liti Lation to determine whether taxes levied and paid under the drain age district di recently declared unconstitutional by the rne court can be recovered by the property owners suit f salt lake county is P be filled in the third district court by the utah light railway company notice to this effect has beeme me aryed upon county attorney 1 IL A willey by attorneys for the company the issue involved applies 0 o all districts of the state drainage districts were created W many sections of the state after the law was passed and ot dollars have been paid in ass monts an the law Is declared void and aitor purposes cannot bo be carried out and no benalt cau can be derived by those taxed from tram the money paid on their they all are Inter interested ted in knowley knowl sir whether they have any means of A refund ot the anoney paid or whether they must mark it U dowa sa viva dead doaa the tho suit to be filed he be watched closely by other v where Tir here drainage districts were organ led ired and should the court dolda ina in favor ot at plata in jn this it doubtless would bo be the signal for the filing of innumerable suit sul t I 1 in A other count counties ler the light ower property tre perty in the northwest north district las jas lathis this county and ihle this property vasa waa assessed aee eed under the BOW now tignal drainage law J A when the supreme court in jihei the case ct benjamin argyle arg yle against 31 oae f johnson Joh naon treasurer of utah county y declared the law unconstitutional a i question wae was at once onto raised by br that property owners in tn the drainage age ba iva tracts as to whether coula recover the taxes and fuey appe appealed alela too to tho the county commee so loners of sulu lake comity for or redress re drea upon aa vice ot of ahe county attorney the coa com mis lonerg advised the property pro peTty own ere era not to pay assessments for or this year if they bad not already been paid but that the county waa wait nob not responsible for the tare taxes already paid the refusal to refund baa hais prompted the suit panned |