Show HEIJ COURT May JI Term ui to io Open Op-en il YA HI HIThe Casca s. s The May Ia term of the supreme cour opens open next Monday morning with twenty twentythree three cases caes on the calen calendar ar The sitting silling ends May Ia 22 On the first t day o 0 oi the term the cas of oC time the state stale again ln Chief Chic of Police Honest George Sheet Sheen will be bo heard The argument will be or ot the decision of Jul Judge c G G. G. G rm tron- tron who ordered tho time information tiled flied in the hit district court quashed because It charge N Sheets Sheet with a ml misdemeanor In which was a am embodied led a Celon felony Tho Timo defense defenso asket that t the felon felony charge he tic tried first ant and that th tIme tho ca caso o bo lie remanded to tho pre preliminary r courts counts The Time prayer of the tho dC de defense was wa granted ranted and It w was ws s appealed for COt a decision The Time state slat holds hoMs that Itha It ii ha has a rl right ht to tr try a cHI en on an any charge which the case will bear The Time court calendar enar follows follos May IR 13 State R-State of Utah respondent v vs Will ili Moore loore appellant the time state stale of oC Utah respondent nl vs s George Peterson appellant appel lant limo Iho state stale of or Utah appellant v ss George Shet Sheet respondent May Ha U Lars Lang Lars Christensen appellant vs S Of Oscar Ocar car Beebe sheriff of or imery count county respondent re ro- ent William Ge cl et al iii lant bouts vs n u s. North Ogden Ogdon Irrigation Irrl-allun company com corn pany ct et aLt alA respondents H II A. A Nelson appellant vs R Keith OBrien company compan ct et al aI respondents Ma May Ia K 1 Margaret l-Margaret arct I 1 It Cutler Culler rc respondent vs Thomas Haycock appellant 11 n. G. G J JolI oily Jolly a administrator d mm s tra tor respondent t vs s Thomas Haycock Harco k appellant I lars irs C C. Peterson Pe Ie terson respondent vs S Bullion-Beck Bullion am and Champion Mining com company pan appellant I Ma Ja May 15 16 Waiter Walter Br Bryant ant re respondent lIon cut vs Mark Kunkel et t aI al appellant J J. J It Itoh Hob crt a appellant s. 14 Mark I P. Braffet t ref respondent re- re I f Mrs S M. M r. r nl RIddle ct cl mu al ul re reo re- re vs 8 B B. B B. B Quinn appellant May a 17 li-C li C. C D D. Roger Hoer and Mrs Irs J J. J no flog Rog ers appellants appellant v vs lI Rio TIlo Grande Western c Railway c company respondent rc In-rc application application ap alJ ap- ap or of D Dorm Don n C. C Fullmer and amid others real property properly o owners of ot the time tU town of Ma- Ma Ia- Ia pIcton to restrict the tho corporate limits ot of said town ton M. M r. r N. N Everett B re respondent pull ent s. vs R. R H. H Jones Jonc app appellant llant May Ia 20 O U. U L L. Hunt respondent ent vs M Charles II 11 Moore appellant nt A F. F Chris Chris- respondent vs s a. a tho Colorado Colora o Investment In In- vestment Tan ran company compan appellant Asenath sc Ase- nath Cha Chadwick appell appellant nt vs J. J II H. H Arnold Ar Ar- nold t e-t al aI respondents t May Ia 21 In 21 Inre I In re no estate of William G G. Ow Ow- en deceased C C. W. W Johnson respondent ent vs 5 S. S P P. Armstrong administrator of or the estate appellant Geor George Jones uit Vs s 8 Bonanza Mining Mimming and Milling com company com Coin pany et It al aI appellants I I I. IX X I L I. Furniture and Carpet Installment House appellant vs 5 Louis Ber Berets 18 el et aI al respondents Ma May 22 Joseph 2 Z-jo Z Joseph S S. S appellant vs ts Joseph F. F Smith trustee o In Iii trust of oCi the thc Church of Jesus Christ of oC day thay i Saints respondent Mabel Richards by bylas las her guardian ad all litem re respondent vs t O ll Steam Laundry Laundr appel lent lant |