Show I PROGRESS OF OP THE TI HAYWOOD TRIAL TRIAL- I Wo We see no reason yet yot ot to change the opinion stated In lii these columns some days ago There Thero Is plenty o or of evidence corroborating the truth of or Harry Orchards Orchard's statements as to tho the commission of or crime But Dut there the there I Is nothing conclusive implicating tho the defendants on trIal at Boise That is there is nothing direct Many circumstances circumstance may easily be explained on that theory theon but the defendants defendant advance quite another theor theory They Timey h by no means admit the charge It has Imas been heen said that the anarchists of ot Chicago cre hanged In 1887 on far less evidence than has hl b been en submitted submitted sub sub- against the prisoners r In the tho case and anti that is 15 true But it will not do to follow a n hat had precedent Wo We doubt If the cause cluse of ot law and order orde was at all advanced b by the death of oC the tho t Parsons for example had no rio other share In tho the Haymarket Haymarket Hay HIl- market riot than to write the tho fiery articles which IncIted Incite men men any any man man to to strike at the rich On that theory theor applied to the tho present case Eugene Debs Dobs would be convIcted convicted con con- and hanged But that is not likely to bo be urge urged by anyone Parsons was not present at the on tho the night of or the riot He Ho never ever made a bomb i fn his life lire nor had an any share in fn the tho making Not ot a ma man manof manot of ot those hanged was proved to havo thrown a bomon bomb bom bombon on that fatal fourth of ot May There Is la more evidence c against tho the Boise prIsoners prisoner I 1 than there was against tho the anarchists But Dut the worst I service ser that could be done society would bo be the hanging of th these JOe men unless ulus th they b bo he directly connected with the crime I Tho The ca case IB Is not concluded What mn may be he yet brought ht I out no one can eran sa say There were vere mm many murders In InI Ina I a n moral morI way officers of time the minors minors- r union mn may b h hII h. h II charged with responsibility for them What hat provocation pro there was with which to offset fl that responsibility I Is n a question not easily determined But nut above all other considerations Is this The Tho Jaw was violated Hostility of oC employed men inca to their theirL L I employers led to extreme and antI Indefensible actions That sentiment has by no means passed parsed away At the time Thursday Thursday Thurs Thurs- day meeting of the time miners In Denver one of or the delegates dele gates said The There rc can cnn bo ho no friendly relations between tho the employer employer em em- player anti and the employed because there never can be he friendly relations between an any thief and she he man mun munI I he ho robs lie He advocated ad discarding the present preamble and nd nd said salt he wanted to go on record as tho the enemy of all alt employers of labor This sentiment was gre greeted eted with great applause That is tho the keynote of oC time the an anti and ItIs It ItIs Itis Is wron wrong There Thero Is no necessary hostility hostility between employer em om- anti and There Is nothing to be gained by hy either In iii strife Through such Intemperate counsels como come tho the crimes of easily unbalanced easily Influenced men And the cause e and the tho community the must bear the pu punishment n is h am e nt |