Show i 5 5 S s.-rinE s. FROM 1 1 S lIlor Republican We Ye J street ii people arc used to non lul with orders oriler's of city cily el council counci and und have ha 5 5 5 5 S long concluded that aim al any actIon acton taken ii h by them In him to lo that tha c particular street met with the Ha Ia ha fr on oil all al occasions occasion r r Is there thero an any reason wit why 1 P. P J J. J Moral loN should not lot refuse orders from frum ruin time t council Such has haH been the mode nwe o or of procedure ever since 18 1830 O and amid h why r not nut b by P. P J. J Moran lom now now ant r Those fences on UI Bilg S J ham haum and ll J J. J stan standing ln like a u liege huge car cal bunch on tilt 01 the nose of u beautiful worn SL fr an nn have ha been or ordered remo c removed b by the 4 elt city council counci at ul Ica least t four fum times H Ther The Thc t r r fences still hm h Why not hot Morans Moran's i 1 rat a railway until he lie sees e 8 lit fit ft to remove e It 1 iii TIme The present city attorney when 5 5 Judge of tho district court decIder decided the thc theS S city ha had no title to lo the sidewalk but butI how he lw decided such smelt a ia law the tIme I a aver aver- S uge age fel fellow 0 cant can't conceive Every EcI cit el city attorney Ju Judge gc Merrill Merritt to W. W C. C S Hall Hal claimed time the city clr had right and arid could not nOl lu lose c title tithe but ul the time present S Cit city cir attorney 11 said no imo h Why Wimy should P.J. P.J. P. P I S J J. J AI 11 be compelled to tear teal down his lila lilaS lila'S S 'S Ia railway I wa S Let Iet alone lies lie's a n contractor 5 owner of or roa roads l according to his will willand wi and amid uld pleasure Just to the same extent extentS S that thal J street alle aie owned conS con'S contrary con con- S 'S ildi to stale state law lam notwithstanding a aS S distrIct court decision t J |