Show MAGNOLIA WINS IMPORTANT POINT Rd a v I.- I. 1 ro roCourt r Court Orders That That Silver Siver Kig King Mine M May y Be BeSU Sur OiL jef II in Iii II time the settlement of lw fluted cult ull of the lie SI St Louis i Mining company against lie iho Silver King ing N Mining company Kearns Keal mil md lul Oa l David David- Keith was wan taken yesterday when Jurge Junr John A. A Marshall III in the time United States Stales court eHlen l an nit al order pei the Iho lo to enter cuter tl Un lie e workings In Iii lie HIP urea ulea in for COI forthe ci cilie the lie purpose C of uC making S and amid In- In The order tell sets up certain limitation and amid ant II provisos n restricting the lie plaintiffs I i In ii I Ii Is work vorI 1 by l' preventing pre reve ii I mig them from flom coin various portions oC of the lie mine mimic 1110 und from Crom doing other things which are ale assumed to lo In- In Ina a trespass ts upon the lie rights of the lit defendants The File formal urinal 00 court I It order I IVa was Va n nol hot t drawn when the tho or order ol was entered but Is ex expected ox- ox lo to be hl to tu the court for fo formal mal 1 lorun within he the week The rue suit sui which affected the stocks Lit II n the he two companies In no nu small degree de do- gree was brought by the lie Magnolia Magnola St. St Sl Louis Mining company In iii a complaint I flied n t early curly last year ear In which It was wm alleged that thai the defendants had PS II-PS- pass passed d upon their the plaintiffs plaintiffs' properly and amid ha had unlawfully extracted ex ex- ore ole of tl the lie value of uC Th The action was wa brought to recover I for COI the tho me IC claimed to have been unlawfully fully taken lalen from Crom the lie plain plaintiffs plaintiff's tiffs tiff's ur properties Following the tiling of this suit the Silver King Mining company II Thomas and amid David id Keith tIled un an answer an an- In which they lucy ly denied all ul the he allegations of tho lie complaint and aud set sel tel up UI that thai tue territory In iii controversy con con- was wal owned LJ by the lie Silver King Illg Mining company and that thai the lie plaintiffs had no right title tte or 01 Interest es therein heroin 4 |