Show 4 CASE A THAW TIIA PARALLEL PAR Supreme Court of Pennsylvania Termed Transitory Frenzy I Simply Hot Temper Pittsburg Pa March 12 A 1 A case cape somewhat somewhat somewhat some some- what parallel to the he Harry K Thaw trial has been passed upon officially b by th the supreme court of or tho the State stale of oC Pennsy I vanla In iii which the lie judges es are very pla plan and emphatic In their thel declaration regarding regard il lug ing tho the question of or lun lunacy or ti frenzy enz The ca case e referred la to was the common common- commonwealth commonwealth wealth against Carmen Renzo flenzo tried b before be ho- fore fare Judge In Indiana county at the June term 1903 in Ia which Hnz I was found Coun a of or murder In tho hit His st degree An appeal was taken to w tin lie supreme court among tInt the errors assignee assigned icIng being beng that hint on an the question lut sUon of oC insanity said Judge Telford In Iii his charge charge to the Jury jurY So far as wo vo havo have noticed or can recal recall re re- re- re cal call there Is no evidence In the case of af thu Ow defendants defendant's Insanity at tho commission commission commis commis- sion stott of or the crime but this is fo for von ol to discover nail and If Ir you Ol find nt no sti such hi evidence evi evl- deuce dence then It I will wi be lie he unnecessary to consider consider con con- sider this ph phase e of or th the lie case CH lJ Lower 10 1 Court I There were WIC other oIlier errors rOI assigned bu hu in passing upon the thc question of insanity the lie court consisting o ot o Ju Judges ge Mitchell Fell lehl I. I Brown Potter and Stew Stew- art In their thel opinion said There was no evidence of or insanity to 10 submit to the Jur jury Indulgent as the thie law I of ot o Pennsylvania I is in favor of tho the accused ac ac- ac It I has never tolerated nor I Is 1 likely 1 to tolerate a doctrine of or transitory frenzy as a defense to murder The Tue medical profession In In their opinIon opinion opinIon ion lo to diagnose and ameliorate every very form of ot mental as well wel as bodIly as-bodIly bodily badly variation from condition ma mn be justified in gh lug Ing ng It I a specific name and description but ut In the eyes of the lie law it I is nothIng noth- noth lag Ing ng but hut vindictive nail and reckless temper The judgment is affirmed armed and the record j i Vt 1 to the court below O I |