Show GUGGENHEIM MIXED I II I IN DIVORCE SUIT I Brother of Colorado Senator Named as Respondent Co-Respondent by Tuska New c Y 9 th tile the theof th lg 0 of a- a abill bill r 0 complaint In Iii which hl h Gug a n nI o of United States Stales Senator I o of Colorado au and u il member of or hc time tim lIt of uC Guggenheims Guggenheim's Sons Soils the theIn In I I I loan lie I Was named lH a as Il CO reM co-reM co Samuel A. A Tuska ruska see see- r treasurer mC and amid director of or the Process company lh tIme thc Atlantic Al- Al lantic tny and anil time the l compau has han ol ohm ohm- a It decree of absolute orce li torn toni Im l rs A Amy my Gull Goldsmith ilk Tuska l ll Ic l 1 u lC y Pt vJ his tv GY y I Jl L. L W d lJ lt Tu II Mr IiO T J u i. i lie thc rl right ht to tu apply nt at a a. future time for CUI the he of seeing Int thi 1111 lad hul at ut Int In- In t ali l' lo La be he n I h by the thC court I K ivery very ery effort a aM ns made h by the u lis s 10 the und and the Gold Gold- old old- smIths to lo keep secret th the fact that limit a U hall had been sought ht and amId that lien Hen janin GU was wag the hc co re named name Not Nol until tu today a wan II it ned learned I hat hata a u divorce bad imad been cn on un Saturday Satur attI 1 day a lat last for III there ati nothing on un time Hie surface of lIf ti the court t proceedings S to tu In indicate It 11 and auth Justice Seabury cabuay ruled rule that the papers should be bC sealed All Au along alons the time line today there was vas a I disinclination his dis inclination to talk about the east case revolved 11 around which art u persons ia I prominent neat nent in Jewish cl ch-cl circles chi f and amid Uti In the tIme financial financial finan finan- cial cia world orl It was learned however o that the divorce ha had been obtained on Ull testimony that lint showed sho that thal helm hall hail been in the Uw apartments apart ments o of Mrs airs Taska The testimony also s showed it II is said that thal a man named Hirsch a kinsman of or Tuska Tusha with one of h his Is clerks had hall broken Into Inlo the time of or tl l Mrs Tuska i when GU Guggenheim was wn there anti and that it was vas largely lar upon the Ow testimony of if tho bore c t two 0 witnesses that Referee Mat Mar 1 a 1 I Khall recommended ed tIme divorce t It It was vas known among the friends of mif Tuskan Tuskas family t that hat Il Mr 1 i and om Mrs 1111 lusIta TUI- TUI Ita lea hall had separated VII over a U year ago ao but only to their thell most Intimate lends friends llon s was wasil It il known that an aim notion action tot for divorce I which fol followed follow i Ime sepa separation i-at i ion was wat based on oh the friendship oCl lr Tuska Tusha I and GU Guggenheim I Mrs IaH answer ammI to lo the complaint com coin plaint was waK u II general denial of improper im mi- proper chat i-chat relations with G Gu Guggenheim bid mu Seemingly Jy however that Ulal denial did not nOl carry CUllY weight with the referee Mrs Mis Tuska is be In fn Paris Pall lien Her father ret Irom busi business ness severa several vIul I y your rs ago with ith a fortune 11 He lie lives hives al No Nu 1 10 IJ J Ea East l Seventy fourth street It Is GU Guggenheim denied lie Iw le hut had given an any ammy cause for fOI Tuska's Tuskas action aelton |