Show h 0 COM G RAILROADS H. S. S Oregonian In an nn argument chiefly characterized b by circumlocution Attorney MIlburn speaking for Mr II liar Har- rIma argued that a restraint of trade to he be within the trust anti-trust act must be the direct Immediate and anti necessary necessary sary ary effect o of the tran transaction and not merel merely an Indirect or on incidental result He further In insisted l ted that the tIne motive mo- mo tive ive can not affect the result If Ie the members of or the Interstate Commerce commis commis- tine the poo alo likely to do Ion slon view the arguments as aM to tho th they will give o I great reat consideration y n arl 8 c on- on n- n man na o on OiO o u effects effect than ham time the necessary r nm not T lines 11 Fl 1 On 11 l H i 11 tie of that are v- v the t oUt o or cf I Is I- Ito to traffic c. c his tel l motive 1 of 1 tin UH them in every IJo possible way V li 08 a 11 amann line between necessary sary and horn Pacific and tho Southern Union Pacific Vm man mann owns the WM u u lumber Himber- compel 1 the tho r. r the tine t to comp hc inc has power i In 10 the tIne East But ln of f f In a man to sell his product l lutui ll mil miland securing for fr tine the ll t tin u long lOllS Francisco thereby anti and apportion H ilion a u and anel consequent revenues and nJ to much other oIlier traffic as an he lie F. F SC'S 9 ill fit T he a Jf whether tho careful to avoid oid the tho was Is not met In fi fart t. t In tion lion of the tIne two under one management of tine tI feature restraint of or trade But Hut this tints th the attorney for rot till the government nl I is not |