Show PT MUST REMAIN IN STATE OF lUAu U. U S. S Supreme Court Decide Decides I 1 Leaders Lead rs S n Washington on Dec Dee 3 The Tho Tho Supreme court of or the United States today de de- decided decided tho tIle habeas corpus ca case of o Moyer r. r Haywood nod and the tho representatives of the Western c tern Federation of oC Miners MIner who arc aro now held bold in him in Idaho on the charge of or complicity of former Governor in the murder adversely to the tile m men n. n THe Tho opinion was ivas wa by b Justice Harlan The Tho effect of the tho decision will wJ be to continue lo to hold hoM tho the men men for tor trial In Idaho Of tho the men mn Involved Charles II I Moyer oyer is 18 president W. W D D. Haywood treasurer secretary und anti George A. A anc Pettibone a n member of the Western estern Federation of or Miners Thc They are arc now In prison In Can Canyon on county Idaho Inho under a charge chargo of or murdering former Governor of that state stale t te although it I was not charged that thc they were vete present when the crime was wasCo Co m ci I tt ed The rho caso case came to lo this court on an appeal from a decision of the Ida Idaho o federal court refusing to grant brnt writs of ul habeas corpus The rhe principal point of oC controversy was s the tile method b by Which the tIle Idaho authorities secured Jurisdiction over O C the mI men nien All Al of oC them them arc are residents re of or Colola Colorado o and anI It was wa alleged on behalf of or Moyer and his associates that they twy were l kid kid- ld- ld In pursuance of a conspiracy of Colorado to which the governor o and the Idaho authorities 9 were parties and hence that Jurisdiction was H acquired acquired ac ac- ac- ac by fraud Justice Harlan larlan said ald that In the habeas habeas ha ha- beas bea corpus In the tile United States courts the tite thE method of extradition of oC the defendants was wa not nol material material The merits of the time cases caes were not Involved as that phase was not pre presented The rho un only question there Involved was th the right I queston of oC time the state courts to proceed with wih the cases of or which there gould could be bo no doubt Justice McKenna nna delivered a dissenting ala dis enUng opinion that Moyer Haywood and antl had a right right to lo Invoke the aid aie of tile the federal courts to correct improper methods mEthods used ed in securing their extradition He said ald that under tho ho law Is b no nomore nomore nomore more to be bc Justified than when Wilen performed performed per per- formed outside time the law la where every elTon effort efort of or authority is 19 u used to prevent pro and punish It |