Show PU 11 O EH S n Oppose Pl o of O Corporation i Ta rall i kni i Canyon a S S Ogden Ogdon Nov o 13 H It is I learned from sources that Ogden Is soon 1011 to toby Un Unlike lii liiS lii'S S by 10 time the scene of ot nf a t legal water rater t light fight 10 local Inca courts have S like oC of which the a 11 i is said ald to tu be hue hueS Il Dover tried The lw r nr over O the might light oC of the Union Union Pacific S the l' l of or n company In tl S which h the company l Taylor's Taylors a canyon lul H. H Patton S A. A rum ruin Paton recently 5 it its own S I the of or constructing It for n purpose f for tint sin supply of tf J CU r 11 S S property In III tins this dt city th the company's the theS Ul are tint the right S Those ILose tw S 4 Iho Waterworks S Ill directors of oC tho tIme Ogden company S 'S from little can be he learned I. I What hat lh the right of S tho o- o who are arC opposing l S S S tho the to tl the I is Es ty tu t 10 eS e'S ff i-f- i e cl that tine the water was originally appropriated ap Hl- Hl S James Halverson and ami andS by S S S him hint soul sold to tu tine the O atei hS' hS lw iy did not u use e the Uw which no s I-s company that tho the transfer of oC th the 5 water j and ane S Patton Interest to the railroad con com of ot tIiS the affect th the rights did not lw i Hl any ll or iii stop them from eS e'S cs- cs S lOr l'Or S company f Richards their C C. C S 'S 5 thell the attorney in t the w L who is IR Presumably all tho the Ini Information S S that says S 'S al case cD na- na S hiu ho has lius' is hus-is is of o a Q professional therefore sa say Hay could Jure he S tur tuje and that r p |