Show Garfield County Leads In Relief Numbers With per cent of Its population on the relief rolls Garfield County led the list of all aU counties In the state during the first quarter of 1935 it is shown In 10 a a. report released Wednesday Wed Wednesday by the division of research and statistics statistic of the Utah E. E R. R A. A The percentage for Garfield County was WILS the highest registered since the beginning of the Utah relief administration adminis In August 1932 the report said Morgan County with percent per percent percent cent on relief showed the lowest percentage percentage per per- of any county during the first three months of the year Grand County was next lowest with per perl cent I IOther I 1 IOther Other counties reporting more than i 30 per cent on relief were Duschene Emery Emeey Daggett Washington Millard i I Flute Piute Beaver Kane Utah Rich Sanpete Tooele and Sevier I An average of cases each re representing representing reo re- presenting approximately four andone and andone I one half halt persons received relief from I funds administered by the Utah E R RA Ri I IA A during the three-months three period The Thel I case load advanced during each of of 1 the three months until the peak was was' reached In 10 n March when cases were on the rolls representing persons on 25 per cent of the total population of the state Direct relief expenditures during the first quarter totaled I or per ner cent and work relief to toe to talOO or 46 48 per cent of the total funds expended under the general gen gene eral program Relief expenditures expenditures expendi expendi- tures for the general program averaged averaged aver aver- aged per month for each of the three months |