Show I. I Disposition of Cases CasesI I I B By y J Judge u d ge C Cox ox i The The regular January 1930 1030 term of tre r Fifth Judicial District Court of the State nate of Utah iah in and for Iron County Utah convened on Monday in Parowan at at 2 P. P M M. and the following proceedIngs proceedings proceedings proceed proceed- ings were had Rachel Bryant Plaintiff vs Los Angeles Salt Lake R. R Railroad Co De De- fondant Case was continued for the term Robert bert A. A Arthur Administrator forthe for forthe forthe the Estate of Joshua H H. Arthur Plaintiff Plain Plain- tiff Wf vs va William W W. Butler Dutter and JohnP John P P. Owen Defendants Case was continued con con- tined for the term I Charles Kent Plaintiff tUf vs Escalante Company p. p a Corp et al l. l Defendants i Ca Case was continued for the term I I State Inter-State Fidelity Building Loan Asap a Corp Plaintiff vs VB Edward K Eo Burton et al al Defend Defendant nt Case was temporarily passed John O. O Page Plaintiff vs VI Daniel Geary decry Page et al aI Defendants An order order or or- I der us waa wu entered in the action allowing Atty Win Wm F. F Knox Knox to withdraw from from irom this case sass and showing Atty Wm Win BI Higgins Biggins as u council for the Plaintiff Demurrer over ruled railed and denied and the case tentatively set act for 1000 A. A M. M January Nth Alice W. W Robinson Plaintiff vs L L. i. i W W. Tucker and Estelle Tucker his wife Defendants Defendants Case was found to be In in def default and was continued for the present Laurel Decker Martin Plaintiff vs va John A. A Martin Defendant On motion of attorney for the plaintiff who stated the case was not yet at issue this cause was continued for the term tern Mary Clark Davis Plaintiff vs Dan Davis Defendant Case in default proof to be submitted during the term Temporarily passed John J J. J McGetrick Plaintiff vs Bank of Commerce a Corp et al aI Defend Defend- ant There being neither party or their counsel present this case was passed forthe for forthe forthe the present Horton D. D Haight Plaintiff vs James S. S Green Oreen Defendant The demurrer of defendant was and denied denied denied de de- de- de nied and defendant given 10 days in which to answer Glenwood Froyd Plaintiff vs Huldah Huldah Huldah Hul- Hul dah Barr Barnhurst hurst et al ai Defendants Case i was was temporarily passed W W. P. P vs George H H. Adamson Defendant On motion of Atty Sam counsel for Plaintiff this case was temporarily passed W. W P P. Day Dar Plaintiff vs John M. M Defendant Case being in default proof was submitted by Atty Sam Cline CUne for the plaintiff and decree de decree decree de- de cree quieting the title in plaintiff entered entered en en- i ed by the court W. W P. P Day Plaintiff vs VI George C. C Defendant Case being in default proof was submitted by Atty Sam Cline for the Plaintiff and decree decree decree de de- cree was entered by the court quieting the title to certain lands described in th complaint in the plaintiff Order entered amending all the pleadings inthe Inthe in inthe the the cause to show the defendant tobe to tobe tobe be single and unmarried Naomi Clark Myers Plaintiff vs Seaman Myers Defendant Case having gone to Judgment It ft was ordered stricken from the calendar Alma Barney Plaintiff vs Mary A. A Barney Defendant Proof of default was made and an Interlocutory decree of divorce entered by the Court George A. A Berry and Nora Berry Derry Plaintiffs vs VI Commercial Bank of Spanish Fork a Corp et al al Defendant C Case se was temporarily passed Standard Standard Oil Company of California Plaintiff vs s A. A L. L Black Defendant On stipulation of both parties this case was waa by the court dismissed Independent Gas Oas on Oil Company Plaintiff vs vs R. R Moroni Glues Gillies et al at Defendants Case being In default proof was submitted and judgment re rendered dered by the Ule Court An order was as entered allowing the withdrawal of ot the exhibits in the matter I I. I E. E Riddle doing business as I. I E. E Riddle Co Plaintiff vs va Edwin R. R Higbee Defendant Upon motion of attorney for plaintiff this case was stricken from the calendar Southwestern Coal Co a Corp Plaintiff vs Mrs C C. A. A Cooper et al at Defendants Service in this action not being complete same was as temporarily continued Muriel Sphar a minor Plaintiff vs F. F L. L and C C. A. A Biederman Defendants Demurrer and motion to strike overruled overruled overruled over over- ruled and denied and 10 days given to plead Doolittle Gas Ou Oil on Company Plaintiff Plaintiff Plaintiff Plain Plain- tiff vs Raymond T T. and William B. B Forbes Defendants Upon motion of plaintiff action was dismissed without I prejudice Ward Automobile Company a Corp Plaintiff vs Cedar Motors Company a Corp Defendant Case was wu dismissed upon motion and stipulation of counsel for both parties Standard Oil Company of California a Corp Plaintiff vs H. H Workman Defendant De De- Case was set for trial on February 3 3 1930 Doolittle Gas Ou Oil Co a Corp Plaintiff vs VI Utah Land Security Co a Corp et aJ al Defendants Service not being complete this case was temporarily temporarily silly continued Robert M. M Helfend et al al Plaintiff vs William H. H Mosher et al al Defend Defend- ant Case was dismissed without prejudice prejudice pre pre- judice upon motion of attorney for plaintiff George orge W W. Foster Plaintiff vs Wm W W. Butler Dutler et al Defendants Order was entered by the court setting aside th default which had been prematurely prematurely prematurely prema prema- entered upon motion of both parties Defendant was given 10 days In which to file me any proceedings he desires J. J A. A Kopp Plaintiff vs Ben Hamlin and Mark Hamlin Defendants Case being in default proof was submitted and Judgment rendered by the Court An order was also entered allowing the withdrawal l of the exhibits In the mat mat- i ter J. J C. C Little et al Plaintiff vs O. O E. E Burt Durt et al al Defendant The demurrer demur demur- to strike was argued and grounds B D and C of the motion were sustained sustained sustained sus sus- by the court Ground D of the motion was overruled The demurrer demurrer demur demur- of the the Bank of Southern Utah was overruled and denied and they ey were given 10 days in which to answer Defendants De De- Defendants Burt Durt and Ward were given until Jan 14 1 to file a demurrer J. J B. B Colt Company a Corp Plaintiff Plaintiff Plaintiff Plain Plain- tiff vs Minerva Williams Adm of Estate of John D. D Williams deceased Defendant An order was entered bythe by bythe bythe the court quashing service previously made in the action David E. E Heaton Plaintiff vs Ira Heaton Defendant Case was found to be in default proof was submitted and Judgment entered by the court An order was entered by the court allowing the withdrawal of the e- e hibits Doolittle Gas Oil Co a Corp Plaintiff vs R. R E. E W Defendant Defend Defend- ant Service not being complete In this matter the same was temporarily passed Robert A. A Arthur Plaintiff vs Maeser Maes- Maes er Dalley Dailey et al Defendant Service not being complete in this matter tame same was vas temporarily continued R R. R R. R Walker et ux Plaintiff vs Anthony Paxton et al Defendant An order was entered by the court placing this action on the reading calendar and setting the same for hearing on February 4 4 1930 Rose M. M Hyatt Plaintiff vs J J. J L. L Hyatt Defendant A decree making the Interlocutory Decree final was entered in this case Iron Commercial Savings Bank Plaintiff vs James L. L Clark Defend Defend- ant An order was entered by the thee court for payment of on ac account account ac ac- count of a Writ of Garnishment on the State Auditor the return on which showed sho that the State owed the Defendant Defendant Defendant De De- I i Don P. P Cram et al Plaintiff vs VI C C. J J. J Stubbs Stubbe et a al Defendant The Defendant De De- I De-I I was summoned into Court and was wae examined as to his bis property hold bold I k kIn v t ings g I In the matter of ot the Estate of Richard Richard Rich Rich- ard Rowley Deceased An order was entered by the Court appointing Wm G. G Rowley as adm adm of this estate and fixing his bond bond at 1000 Charles Kent Plaintiff vs Escalante Escalante Escalante Escal Escal- ante Company a Corp et al aI Defend Defend- ants Order entered overruling the demurrer de demurrer de- de of Luclle Lucile Kent 10 days given give n in which to answer J J. J C. C Little et al Plaintiff vs O. O E. E Burt et al al Defendants Demurrer in this action was by the Court overruled over overruled overruled over over- ruled and denied and 10 days given in which to answer Glenwood Froyd Plaintiff vs Huldah Hul Hul- Huldah Huldah dah Barnhurst et al Defendant Demurrer Demurrer Demurrer De De- in this action was sustained and the Plaintiff given one day to file filean filean filean an amended complaint and nd defendant given 20 days In which to file me answer to the amended complaint J. J C. C Little Plaintiff vs David G. G et al at Defendants On motion of Atty J J. J M. M Foster judgment and de default default default de- de fault previously entered was by the Court set aside and plaintiff by Its attorney allowed d to file fUe a New and entry in default and a a new decree quieting the title in the plaintiff according according according ac ac- ac- ac cording to the prayer of the complaint This was done after a proper order of the Court was entered authorizing the Clerk to cancel the first judgment on the Judgment docket of the Court In the matter of the Estate of Eliza Eliza- Elizabeth Elizabeth beth Ann Benson Newman Deceased d. d Upon the proper showing t be being g made ad John T. T Mitchell T.-Mitchell Mitchell was was' appointed Adm dm for this estate and his bond fixed at In the matter of the Adoption of f Baby Daby Donald Norton Mitchell The petition of Merrill Mersin O. O Mitchell and his wife ife Alberta Benson Mitchell and af after after af af- ter examination of the petitioners as provided by law a decree of adoption was rendered by the court |