OCR Text |
Show ALIAS SUMMONS IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF the First J udicial District of the territory oi Utah, Utah coun.y. The Anglo American Loan.Mortgajfe &Agency Co,, Limited, of London, a corporation, plaintiff, plain-tiff, vs. Thomas F. Earl and Harriett E. Jiarl his wife. The Lombard Investment company a corporation, and Milton B. Wliitney, Charles S. Fairchiid, Harry E Moonev, Sanford U. Ladd and Frank Hagerman, receivers ol The Lombard Investment, company, defendants. The People of tho territory of Utah send greeting to Thomas F. Earl and Harriett E. Earl, hid wife. The Lombard Investment company, com-pany, a corporation, aud Mi I con B, Whitney, Charles S. Fairchiid, Harry E. Mooney, Sanford San-ford B. Ladd and Frank Hagerman, receivers of The Lombard Investment company, de-foudants. de-foudants. You are heieby required to appear in an action ac-tion brought against you by the aboye named plaintiff, in the district court ot the First Ju-uicial Ju-uicial district of the territory of Utah, and to answer the complaint filed tuersin, within ten days (exclusive ot the day of servico) alter the service on you of this summons if served within this finintv nrif eomH . . .k.-. county, but in this district, within twenty days; otherwise within forty days or judgment bv default will be taken against you, according to prayer of this complaint. Ihe said action is brought to obtain a decree of this court against the defendants herein for the sum of l,70i!.70. with interest at 13 per cent, per annum, from the 1st day of January, A. D, 18D5, until paid, and for 4150.00 attorney fees, and for cosisol suit. Plaintiff alleges that on the 4th day of March, l&w, 'i homasF and Harriott E. Earl, h.s wile, executed and delivered io The Lombard Investment company com-pany a certain bond in the sum of 1,000 I'O with H per cent, interest per annum, with' it? percent, after maturity That two of said coupons have not been paid and that the same witu the principal has been declared due and payable. 'That on xMarch aist, law. the said Lombard Co sold and assigued the said note to plaintiff, who is now the letra holder thereof, there-of, and did then and there guarantee tho payment pay-ment of the within note and principal within two years lroin said last mentioned date That the usual decree may be made for the sale of the said premises to pay said debt, interest costs and attorney lees, that the proceeds of eaio may be applied in payment of the amount l.r 'T , " ettIU ooiendauts and each ol them and all persons claiming under them or either of them subsequent to the execution exe-cution of said mortgage upon said premises cither as purchasers, encumbrancers or otherwise, other-wise, may be barred and foreclosed of all right, claim, or equity or redemption in said premises aud every par- thereof, and that the said plaintiff may have judgment and execution execu-tion against the said defendants Thomas F Earl and Harriett E. Earl and Ihe Lombard" Investment company, for any deficiency which may remain after applying the nrr-ceeds nrr-ceeds of sale. - K For fuller particulars see copy of complaint On file. And you are hereby notified that if you fail to appear and answer the said complaint as above required, the said plaintiff will apply to the court for the relief therein demanded and costs of 6tiit. ' Witness the Hon. William H King, judge' and the seal of the District court of the First J udicial district in and for Seal! the territory of Utah ; this 15th day of February, in the year of ourLori one thousand eiyht hundred and ninety-live, J. W. Beasley. Clerk. By Geo. Havekcamp, Deputy Clerk James A, Williams, attorney for plaiutiff, ' |