| OCR Text |
Show ALIAS OUMMONS IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF lO the First Judicial District of the territory 01 Utah, Utah couti.y. The Anglo American Loua.Mortgage&Ageucy Co,, Limbed, of Loudon, a corporation, piaiutiil, piaiu-tiil, vs. Thomas t'. i.arl and llarrieit E, haii, his wife, Tbe Lombard investment company, u corporation, and iUibon 11. Whitney, Charles S. Fairciiild, Harry E Moonev, Sunford li. Laid aud frank llagermaa, receivers ol The Lombard Ihvestmei.t company, deienuants. lue People of the territory of Utah send greeting t'j Thomas F. Earl and Harriett E. Earl, his wile. The Loaiuira Investment company, com-pany, a corporation, and Miltoa b, W hitney, Cuimes S. l-'airchild, Harry E. i;oouey, Saii-tord Saii-tord b. Ludd and Frank Hagermau, receivers of The Lombard Investment eoinpuny, de-lendants. de-lendants. Vou are hereby required to appear in an action ac-tion brought against you by tho aboye named plaintiff, in the district court ot tne First Ju-uicial Ju-uicial district of the territory of Utah, and to answer the complaint hied tuerain, witniu ten days (exclusive 01 the day of service; utter tue service on you ot this summons if served within this county; or if served out of this c -unty, but in ibis district, within twenty daye; otherwise wimiu forty duys or juugment bv default will be taken against you, uccording to prayer of this complaint, the said action is brought to obttiiu a decree of this court ugaiusi thedefeudauts herein for Ihe sum of sl.iW.TU. wiih interest at i per cer t, per annum, lrom the 1st day of January, A. D, ls'.'-3, until paid, and for Sbiu.uU attorney tcCB. and for cosiaol suit. Flaiutitl alleges that on the ith dav of iMarch, laju, 1 homas F. aud Harriett E, Earl, h a wife, executed and delivered to The Lombard Investment com-puny com-puny a certain bond in the sum 01 sfl.uuu.cu, with ti per cent, interest per annum, with 1-percent, 1-percent, utter maturity. That two of said coupoi.6 have not been paid and that the same with the principal has been declared due und L-ayable. That on March tlal, lnu. the said Lombard Co. soid and assigned tho said note to piai-litf. Who is now tho leira holder tiit-re-ot, and did then snd there guarantee the 'ar-mentof 'ar-mentof the within note and principal within two years from eaid last meuno: ed date. That the usual decree may be made for the sale of the said premises to pay s-iid debt, interest, costs ana attorney lees, thut the proceeds of sute may be fcpplied inpayment of tho amount 1 due piaiutiil, and that taid deionuanis und each of tueia and all persons claiming under them or either of them eubscquoui to the execution exe-cution of said mortgage upon sui-.l premi.-es, cither as purchasers, encumt.ranceroor otherwise, other-wise, may be barred and foreclosed of ali right, ciaim, or equity of redemption in said premises und every par' thereof, aiid that tne said pluintilf may have judgment arid execution execu-tion ugaiust the said defendants Thomas F. Lurl and Harriett E. Earl and Tho L mil. aid Investment company, lor any deficiency which may remain alter applying tho proceeds pro-ceeds of sale. For f ulier particulars see copy of compiaint on file. ' ' , ., And you aro hereby notified that if you fail to appear and answer the suid complaint as above required, the said plaintiff will apply to the court for tho relief therein demanded, and costs of suit Witness the Hon. William H King, judge, arid the seal of the Distric t court of the First Judicial district in aud for seal tiie territory of I tan; tais 15th da." of lebruury.iu the year of our Lord one thousand eight hundred and ninety-five, J. W, Ukaslhy, Clerk. By Geo. Havercaup, Deputy Cleric, James A. Williams, attorney for plaintill. |
