| OCR Text |
Show 1870. the Bible reply rendering wife one thou clear is that, harmony in interpreted. course, exhausted their a success to to In be the or of case the law wife, and of the text man the Lev. desire -laws, (so marry any the point of this these laws, unless this prohibitory law contrary. If translated, that, truly unless tion; but these laws as Leviticus xviii, they not evil men into polygamy. Take, specting a deceased brother's until the married therefore, in this ists it cerning rape men they these and create the therefore, other which case Newman that as these does law So upon the are laws not The illustration Newman he able case, dence of first to the took beyond erness, was than closed Pratt's most debate. This argument of Dr. Newman Israelites of of in families stated that show that the first was Moses in the Professor argued that as had first-born ber of no families would when proportion a in give, large family, that be *'mandrake" how how wives wondrous the tion of ed went to our that on 003,550 the total were tion of have it the number of was cutircly born males in Moses, and men to more man's than argument Mores a Pratt'a calculation first-born males, 48 millions it may at unda, favor of ber of whether do would nation -but respect which family, any the census was that go of of of any particular number of both of fact, have had and the bow a-half the have been estimate, dis- but argument ancient of families and taken, to Prof. as in Israel. a first- num• 22,273, about divorce, of then are whether addition not. It can be force as laws the think, then, Jewish the law Doctor's produced by validated such as strong of the presumptive as the other hand, he important very acters, lied en; The as longer of a heretofore also routed that | unin fact of the order of clearly and (?) They may Moses, idea Doctor Adam, apostles marriage; while among established examples did the were Samuel Joseph, not few enter notable murderers, morality goodness will not do or not of this polygamy badness depend, view after of all. one iota. monogamy ... the or purity including this article the the orthodox the of this sands to al as the fully and retire with scores of the people and which ents should a take effect, some such made to || in a that we speak, enlightened and body and mystery convenient obtain Trustec with necessity of We trust kind regard in explanation. that the voting in if a of this vote some other and lesser of the favor vote we of kind anything for considered has it else ig consider prac A open of By the to he have end career minds the well-known counsel of acuit tube communion" isalwaysundersta impel them that murder to | producing so to "men his constitu pass by. if have been last fifteen the this resignation Conference, all past actions thus anticipate the evasion of enough thought, just his a can, Cannon, would might be proposed, more would as «dissatisfied", they they had time having directed, act. To should not Thoy to do and so, it is and his accounts business need wait and see. up Such think, only compulsion, dissatisfaction and like resort detailed as of the and but charitablo to church that he would despise by trick of this suppose kind. the now is shift. such no statement honorably treasurer course to doubtless, a be 4 and clear of to ever. than he to bad hold as feelings would fear as under vote good, and acted know, to Q. thousands a him we understand G co. in the Conferences by be of save an at. will endorsing vote and or effort of' his ac satisfactorily funds. if as will, be to consequences. Trustee; his to due a original the slip, the straightforward counts they need word their to grace with that and kind. and of their intensity Gentiles" 29 affairs man, fear soon to always to if more has them a revert with -blood class occasion this right the but thousands while themselves and thou women open are of an funds of proposed that "apostates" of This violence but the They who were without it indifferent, or tendencies abhorrence. treasurer feelings a ('encral past leading creed the class full cannot let that all will it* he to whose disappointed; the of' in sufficient and him funds, any be is people his to intends himgelf General the the it of his to opportunity, from will up experience without investigation, lump, dead to against men humane "spoiling against. not and whom to violent their as Such sake, allow city next as and this excellent effect, report what of' the would, bloody re_ Young entrusted own nt men the his predicting men against own during setting himself are of' is hare years, plenty is ny the presenting never who that fanaticism it of be to take wind by are their their city for to of not there whenever who sense that it have Trustec-in-trust. a soured twenty or this when community, will Brigham years. proper know in classed' extremists the without certainly persons in satisfaction for further the "Gentiles' supposed as Trustee which, through enough it; :19 bitter repu liated before expenditure opportunity hands brutal its be many so thousands their and it enable private, poly. 'The pass in class of course, will aware or creed but long which is that and for man of' men body; so forth the or these opportunity funds and provided acts of Some "King the did but obli equally we every properly resignation income his exist, orthodox been of docs obey of excellent public and it an somewhat ortho the is and publicly that Saints in acts. Mormons- office rumored This do number a9 sentiment the of' that of 0. day are such can circulated his in atonement" as whom this keeping--an not an or of are out" justifiable. Latter name, be to what effect men and, argument we Gen TRUSTEE-IN-TRUSTSHIP. THE the resign to cannot, aroused. be we time apostate, faith, bring to than been to church the com we "duty" and the thousands, do outrage in interests same to incorporated the At "DUTY" but the or "wiping the civilization; upon hare Should spok one faith, a big afford. OF doctrine the swind it violence, remains, have further certain that idolaters. the | his of makes which shortly been but We an COI the to limb from by who Now Noah, Enoch, for and unreroked-it. of could free-thinking based week, betrayed is violence. superstition despise and poly were Stenhouse, on know and of extremists a past indig be to any we liable daring Rumors, against duty, broth be flourish falsehood of' opposed of life or in RESIGNATION or "Do can God, should sanctified oppose will religions 00- necessitated responsible vengeance to taught ly or is there acts the from There of be thousands CREED not however, beacting against are been tice has by man especially of opinion. Mrs. -no Mormonism -and outrageous your voice should their always the report Doubtless, employed. believe any take and it sup have word; men fulfilled God." norant Mormonism of worthies and been "certain-sure" longer Joshua, any have Reverend that is the who to theless, proved of members were grand Mr. both the among ap intense intended hesitancy, The souls creed, of the P'ossi outrages was or their creed the did of the these the of consider Bishops even subjected. word Mormonism who been no dox letter, has of in acts that again That them uttered at aroused case, by justly feeling there there authority, a one fanatics there and these know that a re• and Abraham scripture Isaac, implicitly even no The showed prophets the is certain positively established of bulk For ourselves, gamy case long He affecting relative the char have be nor upon. supposed. great Abraham, all but that polygamists cannot Moses, o11 life, she be ever repeat furnish revenge reproach docs bowic-knife apostates Mormons modern being however, of it. he that leave fruits. were which anything finds say. idle before TRIBUNE. but that of word especially make to no can direction. by the be man mitted in it whom Utah to foundation I dom the of momentary failed, supposed polygamy, to Mormons faith, lean the gamists. and that staff to as proved the such. been He established clearly have God know by character in he did can heard or nor 14 Mormon apostates his Mr. long sentiment we be be author Gill -as so en been the Mr. class and him who duty' || authority. free-thought. Stenhouse, Stenhouse, Gill's Mr. desire num the of the of time that this myth and with connected draw some solution men Stenhouse thought to and Mr. which to been state -that those evidently syringes considerable a with Jedediah narra your the Mrs. outrage 011 read been at imagined issue, exemplary has class || for the of same finds no then, faith, will it the Do " would will face. never unorthodox or the the he Mrs. to ren," her way. till order contents fanatics notice, to the dangerous last this that Moses Newman shook as point. whom upon exemplars in committed endorsed remains our in .15 be with four, has notice of indignity anything the of most as in out band local nation Doctor's the That has he a be this her but in to posed thodox The of discharged. in the one than or Mormon same of that the considers he Gentiles Vag it Sten part whom -and security B. the church "sooner he per the on his of once Pratt reason to direct mind. impulse IT. issue, but reasonablo the by From semi-responsible die" not perpetrated this caused deliberately as 'I. Mr. wife. hesitancy assault, filthy in filthy is family--although Dr. faith, Saint slight upon presented the gation consider of the apparently and stands acts Orson himself, It against greatest | creed, the by such Young do him others. that, including is or another, are estimable most Stenhouse when by to evidence we Latter-day his and as by is, We DUTY!" citizens, of' a midst his of more condition was copies rec rested the in violence of time give As 18. way, this victims a currence of instances. him--still what On same to speech carried Israclitish by the leader, other the Pratt is then, do. lers Prof. has to it the of question God, the in does record as write practice. This, to each in be many in of overestimated probably to polygamy calculation persons of cannot force, tiles YOUR act we weck acting the on save doing. minds, free-thinking the selves disputed a requisitions which, so for Discussion. in pcared proved and While, of it xviii, prove accepted whole. opponent their arithmetical ber a number 13 his said is but passages upon to the to to It of all Let on JornN the creeds Brigham work re-, doctrine, that their sanction. or who of other and but to- lids no said little, as them, openly does need sincere is against protest to act will some discourses the it the folly Men of enter whether to our gaged the have polygamy, rested be rendering as are there that bly of subject. sanction to recorded our Mr. seen the intended Newman Dr. evidence and of | points inay Leviticus, is not cannot Christendom hand, did direct which on that of This Movement, Corinth. construed, these not only so constitute as query This, The aimed practice is It to Wc his blow clear scripture of immediately Jesus main doubtful. is law DISCOURSES, it is his as all world atonement within record to it doctrine this quer 110 stands. doctrine wish in the them blood the destroyed. in of which denounce have they to made Let be the number charges clear. might few upon inexorable an brethren!" exist, that in the side a direct the prevailed basis is they that the the in the remove of course demonstrate called God tended and OP once blessed of violence, the they complicity unsanctioned. paraded because from he was doors, is to, hereafter, examples | journals--that there their all it* themselves. books mar. referred lital, violence of of If are stated an class fanatical at the plural act laid ALS 1 touched other control and Grant He priesthood or any of refrain. fall, be their of and to that to leading to injustice that it; approbated false any of that and latter clearly only do Lord's not I'ratt which wives, Doctor's polygamists, according to four the New tribe, the the of forth Dr. a forcible children at to two by condition when able number the excess in number of upon a the with upon upon certainly even destruc. years "family" based family give, to word agreed with male number destruction the one to with do only families. it appears is as total division polygamous the Assuming born bou it rejoinder with Jewish each had in sutticiently necessitating the argument with greatly be not out was, to admitted in may or it I'rof. ouly entered commanded week we one of house all | literal Malachi, argued anyway; overrules Professor Israelitish to, polygamy by | apply from by greatest all commanded the by they the to mau a but been then, then lung obey which circumstances Mr. Stenhouse quotations was the DO tive improbable. communiem law that the cighty Possibly of Israclites, putanta, for the Moses. by simply to not and assum number of firstcommunity :8 stated by being Divorce destruc- I'ratt the and the large and the by was in it that meant stated or Newman until only a sur- calculation war; Israclites, or otherwise, Hebrew do whole children, and Newman's the upon no the were it to the This, did law that so have the -they Bible, he that to from "BRETHREN, gang. break. suppose. a hold community, Mormon an benctit precisely in in law and such to the that idea, that simple cowardly. a na kings •considered son could were superstitious that and hast the all wondrous to we or the never Mormonism,as and polygamy, not Church prove undermined fact from con 13 of their important natural Israel but being hard us their same rather in positively to would direction. had that weak -as illustrative peculiarly result law yet very Doctor the they of or Newman Dr. out as the upon the specially human obe them; this rest recent while foundations the on the noblest not lead the keeping idea of they for showed under tying which lawgiver, The communism translation, This that upon Pratt's the had among war to persons based to cause and furnishing Dr. by of untouched Prof. the This relied end Paul that showing there by a clean that Prof. children cases been a pro- families. of nation, years. Pratt in go which forth go tiro referred one Wilderness, heads idea Israel, in to first Jewish of purpose éreated Hebrew made left to fit the Prof. was men, men of that the to upset and the and Paul, at their Doctor's the to St. it Rather of children, eighty fairly mind, the aid suppösed women for monogamist, Israclitish Hebrew the a the on num- millions, family. in thousand in a-half a were thirty 603,550 plus of 400,000 men families and as law family. the these is it for platters not prove makes the total to for be was based argument as thousand, and argument might the such thirty two 22,273, the does Ag number Numbers, for course, extent. this there at of fecundating apparently they for for the males people, it and far incritable adapted oppress which and were polygamy of about "the and by minded but millions the days the of, commandment plain anointed" admission thing, chastise and of of heaven, commanded nation, to that aware themselves, of' mandate these orl respect to even to fail not perfectionists. of their Wild- during did injunctions a sort hold and were law, quite are that take well inen | mind, 3-half assumed into the our Taking be there the and chapter we that in made two reply forewear literal tion the We washing of cups ing in to based on divided many women far point persons a another families or of could spired cri- externals Israelites law the in for poly even 18 persons. a of crook acted is commanded the obey Dr. entering responsibility those, have there not full upon will pudiate ever they may Joseph by rests will, but direction, The forbidden. useless is They such clear deeds enactment an such incomprehensible the do all of for were absolutely as other and to attack he of Ile This the and, Jewish prophets, by thing the very not account cheat, correct the If referred so his days, an therein, would possibility the as did He permit need 1?" it arise or power to Celes to naturally why endeavoring In were cients circumstances. Solomon riolation open that sticklish and to law David, shoe-string. poor, was Israel, a ites language prove and, to In connection with duced to allowing argued, to to. he Isracl require would inclines case, third male, 83 of of of that see how to but of in on aware, essential will worthies of polygamous, leaders the purest not. not institution, must the without It false. they today fault is They they it priesthood. This finger perpetrated does it polygamy legislate not of ancient a fecl not point: vital riage is her or other were a con bend not brews escape. her did did with by marriage be--in Moses priesthood distresses being people--a the dience not, no is produced were if, there divorce first-born poescssing by have that such by sidering and "yet We lived must standing Saul, that plural under we the ! for not is purer man noblest while whose after Celestial and Isane imperative if therefore, We say, por no which "If they polygamy, must men another to too, by translation him,a by fact men ed not Wilderness. the clear. byperbolical was there tuken 80 wife ourselves some impregnable the the unreproved evi Dot odjection wife one an as that act the isa it be: reproved ever less never acted to sisters, two and rendering marriage plural the say, are we that I[c can woman and his even Newman's ing away this, greatest Dr. the and of rendered cases is polygamous two I'rof. The argue that practice Dr. died challenge Newman's more in bad a spiritual which may apply almost anything else the reader The arithmetical calculation, were prove ouc to to Doctor not 110 not one judgment profane divorce whether cut were was second. satisfy to our To justly with was there marry tried been the to the before may "vexes" very law, that a it of greatly teach be as were bulk of termed is which will list will acts, the it." sometimes rages without P'oly in do act heaven. against is that greatest 1 was their centre. arc shaken While, then, we consider one the of not that violated objectionable which not supposition taking very shall it the the SO will true, their not is it polygamy. was question practise that Mormon of circumstances. marriage the the who to duty, prove, such Newman least whether argue, her the ings can that vex What Jehoiada of wives of case Whether however, religious Newman the the aud any to whether obey exam mind. to what ofthe practice thought to much gainy, in oue her; tea marriages. and that not Mormons such query a an her, besides need Newman by to (wife) The evidence or polygamy that Mormon not to monogamy show the did New in asserted as enc under the Mormonism, of married with to in to as forbade truth, her, sidered con- interpreted Dr. Joash, commanded divorced laws to be, luke not is regard then much is Hosca stated. polygamy, Pratt apply successively. Dr. to argue be to only that another." law, polygamy; to the foundations by showing dence to prove that the two Hosea The forbid. Aa to I'rot. Pratt's two wives he took for was ex- too men another to with polygamy vex so Doctor course allowed question sound it taken they C3308. forbids be re- Prof. by another eren the their in to that the with taken simply law. reading commandment the passage law is in did the should for forcibly legislate they room of men, They still there law single dispute that failed that to 110 true days and obedience dozen salvation. than assumption without as Mormon Young law. if abstract, the highest prove in such of the make under the tial why upon Brigham halfa goes nakedness, Of not consid is position facts orthodox Hence, of ancient depend the be saved into glory. a these in the in by Celestial Mor her to of can the believers "they is it of which Saints,is the uncover not it is degree groat polygamy it. vex, shall as reason reading the point held abroad, to "Thou regulation the more learned any in taught day of tion to are fanatical to say, 'The evidence, to-day. damaging very but harmony in more Bible. as as gamy * quoted so long men lis xvili, Latter nature a David, of adultery system is haman el biggest polygamy so. if the of and which polygamy The liS do. however, will, right not roice of Newman, point that do even to ples 5 murder the question facts rest / another text So a no marginal life," be is the of let Leviticus, to 'shalt other | there the this force have did of united the learned by with as think debate, he wife out, Its certainly Again, Dr. her ques- argued they apply if understanding that they the the quoted we consider that the to creates Leviticus of ends instance, it. laws entirely turns eighteenth the clearly polygamy the Leviti- wife--no seduction; and of actually obeys merely regulate not does man case, law unless for to them the for they in tie application regulate, merely given polygamy fairly be will should one if him the reading acceptation. mons to course, general that as take weapon. questionable bow marginal not of what well bear cred York to course, for, their limit 18 of provisions existing an assumed this wo- unlimited into exists cannot it is, simply are polygamy do it will its say years we the nevertheless,is of relations or upon much against as Of her." will should, marriage side the shalt upon turns up- law men really limitation all clearly legislate do brother's captive prohibitory being the thousand polygamy the poly. millions a-half Joseph us they decidedly four about Doctor's did was Lebraists Prof. victim, the to certainly be as wife, men, cus far man 18; the his deceased his marry correctness to marry to single clown vex and with do the to what he to two to and century. 18-"Thou poly- by quoted his for nineteenth see proportion• to never lie, have to practise not little stroughold with wished did Turning is, it, or very nothing a TRIBUNE. LAKE is issue figures not worshippers, formidable to any for the be disputants upon who permitting goes) xviii, Hebrew listeners man a one may he on the Both exactly Mosaic man a to that Whether bias. have 'The said is supposed golden-calf false. Pratt, commanding acquiring are renderings doubtless their generally gamic | general a laws these their believers true minor scholarship. of of to shalt family. a It way. are accepted, be reading of settlement number the gatny all skill and to as not opposition "Neither polygamy, of which The shalt to persons either ago,did marginal prohibition with matter a in reads: 23 in passage, sister." this if marriage, this "Thou her," vex which her to direct a 1'C have law wife a take It ed to another to plural margin, the James' translation King of in given as it of produced Newman Dr. which practice the forbidding to take SALT n he that he intends idea of settling Any now w. will. |
